You are reading the article Amd Radeon Hd 6990: Serious Inquiries Only, Please updated in December 2023 on the website Daihoichemgio.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Amd Radeon Hd 6990: Serious Inquiries Only, Please
I’ll be blunt: the AMD Radeon HD 6990 is a beast. Soundly outpacing the best that Nvidia has to offer (at the moment), this dual-GPU juggernaut — previously codenamed “Antilles” — clambers to the top of our graphics card heap by serving up the most raw power we’ve seen to date. But then there’s the price: at $699 (as of 3/8/2011), it’s strictly aimed at those ultra-enthusiasts who’ll spare no expense on their gaming rig.
But rest assured, you’re arguably getting your money’s worth — provided you’re already living luxuriously on the bleeding edge. The Radeon HD 6990 is pricey, but it proved to be demonstrably faster than its closest competitor, the $500 Nvidia GeForce GTX 580. For comparison’s sake, I also included the $350 AMD Radeon HD 6970 — the company’s recent single-GPU speed champ.
Inside a JuggernautThe “Cayman” GPU debuted in AMD’s 6900 series, in the aforementioned Radeon HD 6970 graphics card. The Radeon HD 6990 combines a pair of these GPUs onto a single card — think Crossfire, on a stick. The end result is a powerful graphics card that fits comfortably into a single PCI slot (though the card is two slots wide), leaving plenty of room for a second…
Before we talk results, lets talk features. The Radeon HD 6990 offers five display outputs: four mini-display ports, and a dual-link DVI port. Every card will ship with 3 adapters (two mini-DisplayPort to DVI, and one mini-DisplayPort to HDMI), for use in an Eyefinity setup. You can drive up to six displays from the card, including arranging five 24-inch screens in portrait mode. Or my personal favorite: driving three 30-inch monitors. If you happen to own, or are considering purchasing three 30-inch displays, a $700 graphics card is likely pocket change (and if you happen to be looking for a roomate, I’m available).
Crunching the NumbersAs always, we’ll start with the synthetic benchmarks. First up is Futuremark’s 3DMark 11. It’s the latest version of the tried and true 3DMark benchmark suite, though 3DMark 11 has been designed for the DirectX 11 era. The benchmark churns through a number of graphics and CPU intensive tests, and then assigns a score based on how the hardware performs.
The numbers speak for themselves. The Radeon HD 6990 boasts a 67% lead over the Nvidia GTX 580 on the Performance setting, sliding up to 70% in Extreme mode.
The tale is rather similar with our second synthetic test, Unigine’s Heaven benchmark. Heaven is a rather forward looking benchmark, gorgeous and graphically intensive in equal measure. If you’d like to try it out for yourself, there’s a free version available at Unigine’s website. Performance is a bit closer here — the GTX 580 comes within spitting distance of the 6990, just under 12 frames per second slower at the maximum resolution, 4x AA. The divide grows whenever anti-aliasing is shut off, but you probably aren’t going to buy a $700 graphics card to scrimp on visual extras.
Real World Performance
Synthetic benchmarks are an accepted industry standard for checking out theoretical performance, but let’s take a look at how the Radeon HD 6990 fares when tackling real games.
First up are our Dirt 2 and Far Cry 2 benchmarks. Both games are graphically intensive, sporting intricately lit dynamic environments and a fair bit of action. Both resolutions for both tests are run at highest quality settings, with 4x anti-aliasing. At the 1920-by-1200 setting, the results are fairly close. In Dirt 2, the Radeon HD 6990 offers a mere four extra frames over the GTX 580. That climbs up to 27 frames in Far Cry 2, but with the total being just shy of 120 frames per second, you aren’t likely to notice the difference.
A result of 30 frames per second is generally considered playable. Both the GTX 580 and the Radeon HD 6970 manage to hit that mark at the highest level of our test, but if you’re playing on a 30-inch display with all of the bells and whistles cranked up, the Radeon HD 6990 remains an overall smoother experience.
The same goes for Just Cause 2, the most strenuous of our gaming tests.
In this case, the GTX 580 actually dips just under the playability line, and the Radeon HD 6970 is hanging on for dear life.
The Radeon HD 6990 tackles the title with aplomb, its twin GPUs managing to double the performance of Nvidia’s offering.
The overall winner from a pragmatic perspective is the $350 Radeon HD 6970. It doesn’t offer up nearly as impressive performance as its pricier rivals, but it sits at a price that’s a bit more cost-effective. At a 1920-by-1200 pixel resolution, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 580 is technically the better deal. But once you’ve cranked up the resolution to 2560-by-1600, the Radeon HD 6990 offers a strong price to performance ratio — particularly when running at the overclocked BIOS setting mode.
Power, and EfficiencyThat the Radeon HD 6990 manages to post such impressive results while sitting at about 300W is really impressive. Switching over to the overclocked BIOS mode is a bit less energy efficient, but that much is expected.
You're reading Amd Radeon Hd 6990: Serious Inquiries Only, Please
Asus Radeon Hd 6990 Listed, Priced, Up For Pre
Since the official launch of the HD 6990 is rumored to happen no later than tomorrow, it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that some of its implementations are already starting to show up, one of the first to appear online coming from Asus. As you might expect, we’re not talking about an official announcement here, since we’re still one day away from the official launch and the NDA is still in effect, but about somewhat of a slip-up, namely the device being listed for pre-order on a Dutch online shop called Salland. Of course, a short list of specs is also provided, but, as you might have suspected already, it pretty much falls in line with the rest of the leaks we’ve come across up until now, starting from the DirectX 11 support. So, according to the aforementioned source, the new GPU (well, twin GPUs, to be precise) will work at a frequency of 830 Mhz, while also coming equipped with no less than 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory, running at an impressive 5,000 Mhz. Furthermore, the device will be able to output a total resolution of 2560 x 1600 pixels, at the same time featuring a variety of connectivity options, including here one DVI port and no less than four mini DisplayPort connectors, while HDMI and D-Sub interfaces are also supported, via appropriate converters. Now, we were pretty sure that the HD 6990 wasn’t going to come cheap, and the guys over at Salland seem to confirm this, since they’re asking 715 Euro (1,000 US dollars) for the new card, which is, let’s face it, a fairly high price point for most users. However, since we’re not talking about an official announcement, we’ll simply have to wait for AMD’s official statement on the matter in order to start considering what exactly we’ll have to give up (or donate for medical research) in order to afford one such card.
Since the official launch of the HD 6990 is rumored to happen no later than tomorrow, it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that some of its implementations are already starting to show up, one of the first to appear online coming from Asus. As you might expect, we’re not talking about an official announcement here, since we’re still one day away from the official launch and the NDA is still in effect, but about somewhat of a slip-up, namely the device being listed for pre-order on a Dutch online shop called Salland. Of course, a short list of specs is also provided, but, as you might have suspected already, it pretty much falls in line with the rest of the leaks we’ve come across up until now, starting from the DirectX 11 support. So, according to the aforementioned source, the new GPU (well, twin GPUs, to be precise) will work at a frequency of 830 Mhz, while also coming equipped with no less than 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory, running at an impressive 5,000 Mhz. Furthermore, the device will be able to output a total resolution of 2560 x 1600 pixels, at the same time featuring a variety of connectivity options, including here one DVI port and no less than four mini DisplayPort connectors, while HDMI and D-Sub interfaces are also supported, via appropriate converters. Now, we were pretty sure that the HD 6990 wasn’t going to come cheap, and the guys over at Salland seem to confirm this, since they’re asking 715 Euro (1,000 US dollars) for the new card, which is, let’s face it, a fairly high price point for most users. However, since we’re not talking about an official announcement, we’ll simply have to wait for AMD’s official statement on the matter in order to start considering what exactly we’ll have to give up (or donate for medical research) in order to afford one such card.
Ati Mobility Radeon Hd 4860 & 4830: 40Nm Full Hd
Hot on the heels of NVIDIA’s GeForce announcement comes word from AMD regarding their own HD-capable mobile GPUs. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4860 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830 are the world’s first graphics processors to use 40nm process technology, and are capable of beyond-1080p mobile gaming.
According to AMD, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4860 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830 both distill the 3D engines from the desktop HD 4800 series of video cards, and as such are capable of full 1080p video playback and beyond-1080p gaming resolution. However because of the smaller, 40nm process, they’re capable of fitting in ultraportable notebooks.
ATI’s Universal Video Decoder (UVD) can take on all the processing required for playback of a Blu-ray disc, leaving the CPU completely free; alternatively they can upscale to 2560 x 1600 on dual-link monitors. The first notebooks to use the new ATI GPUs will be from ASUS, who expect to have products on the market beginning Q2 2009.
Press Release:
AMD Launches World’s First 40nm Graphics Processors: ATI Mobility Radeon™ HD 4860 and ATI Mobility Radeon™ HD 4830
“People now decidedly prefer mobile PCs, and innovations like this 40nm mobile GPU show AMD is uniquely positioned to make the best entertainment experiences of desktop PCs possible in a notebook,” said Rick Bergman, senior vice president and general manager, Graphics Products Group, AMD. “Depending on the performance of the panel or external monitor, laptops that feature these tiny, powerful but efficient graphics engines can run today’s most demanding game titles at beyond 1080p HD resolution, or playback full 1080p HD video with high energy efficiency thanks to ATI PowerPlay™ and 40nm process technology.”
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4860 graphics will be featured in the forthcoming Asus K notebook.
The new 40nm production process allows notebook manufacturers to deliver more graphics horsepower in a smaller ASIC die size, giving people access to highly capable discrete graphics ideal for smaller notebooks. This milestone marks the fifth consecutive first-to-market process transition for ATI graphics processors.
“AMD continues to push the envelope of graphics processor performance, energy efficiency, and leading features with the introduction of its 40nm graphics processors,” said Mark Liu, senior vice president, Advanced Technology Business, TSMC. “TSMC and AMD have a long history of success bringing the first graphics processors to market on new process technologies, including 90nm, 80nm, 65nm, 55nm and now 40nm.”
The GPU for the best mobile HD entertainment
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4860 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830 graphics processors feature powerful 3D engines derived from the award-winning ATI Radeon™ HD 4800 desktop series architecture with support for DirectX 10.1. Take crisp, detail-rich images and outstanding visual effects wherever you go for unparalleled levels of 3D gaming realism. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4860 supports GDDR5 memory technology contributing to stunning improvements in game play and performance with nearly twice the memory bandwidth of GDDR3.
Home theater enthusiasts can enjoy a portable HD experience with full 1080p HD viewing on HD-capable displays and or TVs. People can upscale to nearly twice the display resolution of HD content or watch standard definition video in near-HD quality with enhanced DVD up-scaling*. The second generation AMD Unified Video Decoder (UVD) keeps the CPU free to run social media applications or virus scan while UVD helps process intensive content such as Blu-ray movies. This helps lower power consumption and reduces the need for high fan settings, enabling a quieter and cooler laptop experience.
Leading energy efficiency
Additional power-saving features include ATI PowerPlay™, ATI PowerXpress™, and ATI™ Switchable Graphics™ technologies.
Availability
Get more information on ATI Mobility Radeon™ graphics processors
Read what AMD’s Rick Bergman has to say about 40nm mobile graphics on AMD Blogs
Check out the images of the new ATI Mobility Radeon™ graphics processors
About AMD
Footnotes:
* Subject to available monitor resolution. The ATI Mobility Radeon™ HD 4800 Series GPUs can upscale video display to 2560×1600 on dual-link monitors which is almost twice the display resolution of 1080p displays in AC mode only.
Best Cpu For Amd Radeon Rx 6600Xt In 2023
AMD Radeon RX 6600XT Specifications
The AMD Radeon RX 6600XT comes with the latest architecture and technology for gamers and creators. The primary focus of the card is to provide the best gaming experience in 1080p resolution, but it is a very capable GPU for video editing and streaming as well. So if you are a gamer, editor, streamer, or content creator, this is an excellent GPU. The 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM makes the GPU efficient and capable of handling any task. The Navi 23 graphics and AMD RDNA 2.0 support make it a feature-loaded offering from AMD.
If you enjoy raytracing, the RX 6600XT is GPU that can fulfill that and provide an excellent experience in games that support raytracing. Any game can run on the maximum settings on the 1080p resolution with this graphic card. According to AMD, at 1080p max settings, the RX 6600XT can churn out 164 FPS in Battlefield 5, 186 FPs in Apex Legends PC, and 289 FPS in Dota 2, and a whopping 553 FPS in Valorant. Whether you like single-player games or online multiplayer games, this GPU can handle them all.
When it comes to its competitors, AMD claims that the Radeon RX 6600XT delivers a 15% faster performance than the Nvidia RTX 3060 in 1080p gaming. The company also claims that the RX 6600XT has 2.5x enhanced performance over GTX 1060 and 1.7x better performance than the last generation RX 5600XT. However, the GPU can not do everything singlehandedly. A good processor plays a significant role in unlocking the full potential of a graphic card. Here are the best processors to pair with the AMD Radeon RX 6600XT for the top-of-the-line performance.
Currently one of the most budget-friendly processors, the Intel Core i5 10600K offers an excellent price to performance ratio. Many might argue that it is an old processor and looks like a compromise, but that is not true. The i5 10600K is ideal for 1080p gaming for multiple reasons.
Sale
Intel Core i5-10600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W
The unlocked processor has a boost clock speed of 4.1GHz that can be overclocked to 4.8GHz for maximum performance. This level of clock speed can handle modern triple-A games with ease. Being an old processor does not stop it from being a powerful option for the Radeon RX 6600XT. The processor is built on Intel’s Comet Lake architecture with 14nm fabrication, making it power efficient and less power-hungry.
The combination of the Radeon RX 6600XT and the Intel Core i5 10600K is a future-proof option on a budget. You can even push the CPU and GPU a little in old triple-A games by playing them on the 2K resolution, but make sure the cooling in the system is sound before doing that.
Sale
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
It offers a base clock frequency of 3.7GHz and a boost clock frequency of 4.6GHz. The Ryzen 5 5600X is also unlocked, and users can overclock it for more performance. The AMD Wraith Stealth cooler is bundled in the box and keeps the processor cool when it is at the peak of its performance.
The cooler handles the processor well in most cases. However, it is best to get an AiO if you regularly want to overclock the processor. Zen3 architecture and 65W TDP make the processor extremely power efficient and a good fit for the AMD Radeon RX 6600XT.
Hexa-core processors are a good bet for gaming on the 1080p resolution. However, if you want to unleash the true potential of the GPU, the Intel Core i7 10700K is a good and viable option. If you’re going to experiment with 2K gaming, the Intel Core i7 10700K will support the RX 6600XT optimally.
Sale
Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K)
It is important to note that the processor only supports DDR4 memory with a 2666MHz frequency. If you pair 16 GB of memory with the processor and the RX 6600XT, it can give a beast-like top-of-the-line performance. Intel Turbo Boost Max technology and Intel Optane memory ensure that speed is never an issue with this processor. If you are overclocking the processor, it is best to add an external cooling system to ensure that there are no signs of thermal throttling.
The Intel i7 line of processors is powerful, and whether you are a gamer or a creator, going with this processor will never be a bad option. Since the processor is two generations old, the prices have significantly decreased. This makes it a good option to get an excellent price to performance ratio.
Sale
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Since it is an unlocked processor, the CPU can be overclocked to extract more performance. It is important to note that the processor does not come with a stock cooler, and overclocking generates a significant amount of heat.
So it is best to add a cooler with the processor to ensure that the temperatures stay in control. It is also based on AMD’s Zen3 architecture, making the processor more compatible with the latest hardware like the RX 6600 XT.
Sale
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core, 24-thread unlocked desktop processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler
It is also an unlocked processor, and you can overclock it to juice out more performance. Cooling and temperatures are not something to worry about either. It comes with a Wraith Prism cooler with color-controlled LED support. With this processor, you can edit up to 4K videos without experiencing any rendering lag. The processor’s price is on the higher side, but the investment is worth it if you want raw processing power for your PC.
Honorable Mentions
Sale
Intel Core i9-10900K Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Sale
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
Aspects to Consider Before Choosing a CPU
Intel or AMD
The Intel vs. AMD debate never comes to an end. Both CPU manufacturers have their benefits and shortcomings. Before choosing a CPU, it is essential to be clear about the CPU’s purpose and the tasks you will be performing. Most Intel processors are locked, and if you enjoy overclocking, going with AMD would be a wiser option. However, if you want to stay on a budget, Intel processors are a good choice.
Clock Speed
Not every processor can be overclocked; therefore, it is vital to choose a processor that comes with a good base and boosts clock speeds. It will keep the GPU from experiencing any performance bottleneck. A fast CPU also makes other tasks easier to perform and execute.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is RX 6600XT worth it?
Yes, RX 6600XT is worth it if you want a 1080p powerhouse that can handle any game with ease. It comes with fast VRAM and good speeds to take on any gaming title.
What is the RX 6600XT equivalent to?
The AMD Radeon RX 6600XT is equivalent to Nvidia RTX 3060 and the Radeon RX 6600. Both the graphic cards are good for 1080p gaming, but neither can beat the RX 6600XT in performance.
Is RTX 3060 better than RX 6600XT?
No, RTX 3060 is not better than RX 6600XT. When it comes to 1080p gaming, the RX 6600XT outperforms the RTX 3060. However, the performance gap closes when 1440p gaming is taken into consideration.
Final Words
The AMD Radeon RX 6600XT is a powerful GPU for 1080p gaming. If you enjoy running games at the highest graphics settings, this is your card. The GPU can also handle 1440p gaming, but you will have to compromise with the graphics quality. Whether you enjoy single-player games or multiplayer games, no other card can currently beat the RX 6600XT in 1080p gaming.
Sapphire Radeon Rx 580 Nitro+ Review: Amd Battles For Pc Gaming’s Sweet Spot, Again
Best Prices Today: Radeon RX 580 Nitro+
Retailer
Price
$229.99
View Deal
When AMD’s Radeon RX 480 launched just under a year ago, it redefined what was possible with a $200 graphics card, delivering uncompromising 1080p gaming, darn good 1440p performance, and even the ability to play VR games—none of which was ever available in a graphics card that affordable before.
Enter the Radeon RX 580, announced today as part of AMD’s mild Radeon RX 500-series refresh.
The Radeon RX 580 release sweeps away all of that controversy—and gives AMD new Radeon 500-series GPUs to sell alongside its new Ryzen 5 processors. But these “new” graphics cards aren’t really new at all, relying on the same underlying graphics processors as the RX 480, but with slightly boosted clock speeds granted by a year of process optimizations. With so little changed, and Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1060 likewise matured, is AMD’s offering still the mainstream graphics card champion?
Let’s find out.
Meet the Radeon RX 580Here’s a look at the reference specs for the Radeon RX 580 and RX 570 (which PCWorld also reviewed). Even though the chart says the RX 570 packs 4GB of memory and the RX 580 has 8GB, that’s just AMD’s recommendation. Both cards will be offered in both capacities.
AMD
AMD’s Radeon RX 570 and RX 580 tech specs.
There’s not much difference from the RX 480, honestly. You’ll find minor bumps to peak compute speeds and memory bandwidth, but the only major tweak is the RX 580’s clock speed. AMD’s up to the second generation of optimizations on the Polaris architecture, which let the company bump the speeds up from the RX 480’s 1,120MHz base and 1,266MHz boost clocks to 1,257MHz/1,340MHz on the Radeon RX 580. The Radeon RX 580’s base clock is now effectively the same as the RX 480’s boost clock. Pretty nifty, though there’s unfortunately no bump to memory speeds or capacity.
AMD
Radeon Chill now supports League of Legends and Dota 2.
AMD’s offsetting that power increase with the introduction of a new power state that reduces energy usage when you’re idle, using multiple monitors, or watching videos. The company’s also stressing the tremendous power- and temperature-savings of Radeon Chill, a wonderful feature introduced in Radeon Crimson ReLive. Chill’s disabled by default, though, and only compatible with 19 games—though they’re 19 of the most-played games around, and coinciding with the Radeon RX 500-series reveal, AMD also announced that Dota 2 and League of Legends now work with Chill.
Brad Chacos/IDG
The Sapphire Radeon RX 580 Nitro+.
Speaking of which, the card we’re reviewing today is the 8GB Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ ($250 on Newegg), which cranks clock speeds all the way up to 1,411MHz, or 69MHz faster than Sapphire’s older RX 480 Nitro+.
Brad Chacos/IDG
Sapphire’s RX 580 needs two power connections.
The Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ maintains a tweaked version of the superb Dual-X cooling system from its predecessor. That’s fine by us. Dual-X’s dual fans and heat pipe-infused heat sink work well—as you’ll see in the temperatures section—and Sapphire has re-engineered the cooler’s design to run much quieter than before. Plus, the look of Sapphire’s card remains stunning.
While many modern graphics cards rock bright colors, angular designs, and RGB everything that cater to the edgy so-called “gamer” aesthetic, the RX 580 Nitro+ sticks to sleek silver-and-black simplicity that looks great in our GPU testing system. The Sapphire logo on the side still lights up, but in a tasteful blue hue by default (you can manually change the color with Sapphire’s Trixx utility). The perforated black shroud looks elegant despite being hard plastic, especially paired with the Nitro+’s gorgeous (and redesigned) metal backplate.
Brad Chacos/IDG
That’s one pretty backplate.
The Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+’s fans won’t start spinning until you toss a decently heavy graphics load at your PC. They’re also held in by a single screw for easy replacement in case of failure—no need to send your entire GPU back. Sapphire’s aforementioned Trixx software even includes a Fan Health feature that, uh, checks the health of your fans and can connect you with Sapphire support if one craps out.
Brad Chacos/IDG
Enough talk. Let’s benchmark!
Next page: Test system configuration, benchmarks begin
Our test system/Division resultsWe tested Sapphire’s Radeon RX 580 Nitro+ on PCWorld’s dedicated graphics card benchmark system. Our testbed’s loaded with high-end components to avoid bottlenecks in other parts of the system and show unfettered graphics performance.
Intel’s Core i7-5960X with a Corsair Hydro Series H100i closed-loop water cooler ($120 on Amazon).
An Asus X99 Deluxe motherboard ($230 on Amazon for an updated version).
Corsair’s Vengeance LPX DDR4 memory ($130 on Amazon), and 1,200-watt AX1200i power supply ($310 on Amazon).
A 480GB Intel 730 series SSD ($280 on Amazon).
Phanteks’ Enthoo Evolv ATX case ($190 on Amazon).
Windows 10 Pro ($158 on Amazon).
Mentioned in this article
GeForce GTX 1060 (3GB)
Read our review
AMD’s marketing materials compare the RX 580 to the older R9 380 and GTX 970, pushing the “upgrade with Ryzen” angle, but we’re not going to do that here. Frankly, the RX 480 already outpunched those cards, as covered in PCWorld’s year-old RX 480 review—especially the older Radeon.
Each game’s tested using its in-game benchmark at the mentioned graphics presets, with V-sync, frame-rate caps, and all GPU vendor-specific technologies—like AMD TressFX, Nvidia GameWorks options, and FreeSync/G-Sync—disabled.
The DivisionThe Division, a gorgeous third-person shooter/RPG that mixes elements of Destiny and Gears of War, kicks things off with Ubisoft’s new Snowdrop engine. We test the game in DirectX 11 mode; The Division recently rolled out an update that adds DirectX 12 support, but the performance is virtually identical to the DX11 results.
Brad Chacos/IDG
Next page: Hitman
HitmanHitman’s Glacier engine historically favored AMD hardware. It’s no surprise; Hitman’s a flagship AMD Gaming Evolved title. That said, GeForce cards certainly don’t slouch after recent driver optimizations. We test in both DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 with SSAO disabled.
Brad Chacos/IDG Brad Chacos/IDG
The Radeon RX 580 Nitro+ again delivers a mere few frames-per-second increase compared to its predecessor, and a sizable lead over the RX 570, though it draws fairly even with the overclocked 6GB GTX 1060.
Next page: Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb RaiderWhereas Hitman adores Radeon GPUs, Rise of the Tomb Raider performs much better on GeForce cards—and it’s absolutely gorgeous. We only test the game’s DirectX 11 mode, as DX12 results can be erratic.
Brad Chacos/IDG Brad Chacos/IDG
The Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+’s extra oomph helps it close the gap on Nvidia’s contender here, especially at 1440p resolution, which flirts with the 60fps gold standard—unlike the Aorus RX 570. The gulf widens at 1080p but that’s to be expected with this game.
Far Cry PrimalFar Cry Primal is another Ubisoft game, but it’s powered by a different engine than The Division—the latest version of the respected Dunia engine.
Brad Chacos/IDG Brad Chacos/IDG
Once again, the RX 580 outpunches the RX 480 by such a slim margin that your eye could never actually see the difference. And once again, the EVGA 6GB GTX 1060 and Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ trade blows depending on the graphics preset and resolution tested.
Next page: Ashes of the Singularity
Ashes of the SingularityBrad Chacos/IDG Brad Chacos/IDG
Surprise! It’s a draw yet again—if you’re on Windows 10. The Radeon card only ties Nvidia’s results if you enable DirectX 12, which isn’t possible if you’re on Windows 7 or 8.1. If you’re on an older operating system, GeForce is the clear winner here.
Next page: Synthetic benchmarks and more
Synthetics, VR, power, and heatWe also tested the Radeon RX 580 Nitro+ and its rivals using 3DMark’s highly respected DX11 Fire Strike and Fire Strike Ultra synthetic benchmarks, as well as 3DMark’s Time Spy benchmark, which tests DirectX 12 performance at 2560×1440 resolution.
Brad Chacos/IDG Brad Chacos/IDG
SteamVRValve’s SteamVR performance test considers all competitors ready for use with the HTC Vive, with the 6GB GeForce card head-and-shoulders above the rest. The Radeon RX 580 can still deliver solid VR at a solid price—though I’d be nervous about the 3GB GTX 1060’s 3GB memory buffer, no matter what Valve’s test says about its VR capabilities.
Brad Chacos/IDG
These cards should do just fine with the Oculus Rift as well, thanks in part to Oculus’ amazing Asynchronous Spacewarp technology.
Next page: Power and heat
PowerBrad Chacos/IDG
No surprises here. Nvidia’s Pascal GPU architecture is still vastly more power efficient than AMD’s Polaris, and that lead’s only extended now that the Radeon RX 500-series cranked up clock speeds. Both are a huge improvement over the power draw of yesteryear’s graphics cards.
The power optimizations AMD promised during idle usage are reflected here as well. While we didn’t measure it here, Radeon Chill can indeed bring down your power use and temperatures significantly—but only in the whitelisted games, and you have to manually enable it. (Which you should!)
HeatWe test heat during the same intensive Division benchmark at a strenuous 4K resolution, by running SpeedFan in the background and noting the maximum GPU temperature once the run is complete.
Brad Chacos/IDG
Next page: Bottom line
Bottom lineThe $200 4GB Radeon RX 480 is still the best mainstream graphics card you can buy today. The experiences it unlocks for that price are still remarkable: no-compromises 60fps-plus gaming at 1080p, darn satisfying 1440p gaming in many games, and even virtual reality. This review didn’t cover a 4GB RX 580, but since the new lineup hews so closely to RX 480 performance, I’m comfortable giving it my stamp of approval. If you’re gaming at 1080p buy this over any GeForce GTX 1060.
Mentioned in this article
Acer XF240H 24-inch 1920×1080 FreeSync display, 144Hz
Brad Chacos/IDG
The $230-plus 8GB Radeon RX 580 is a trickier proposition. It’s most tempting if you’re planning on 1440p gaming or you think the cheaper model’s 4GB buffer won’t hold up well over the amount of time you plan on keeping the graphics card. But its price point puts the 8GB RX 580 head-to-head against Nvidia’s 6GB GeForce GTX 1060 and they’re virtually equals in terms of sheer performance.
Both of the cards are great, and AMD and Nvidia have both been killing it with software and drivers recently. If you value the extra 2GB of memory and affordable FreeSync monitors, go for the Radeon card. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers much better power efficiency, Nvidia’s wonderful Ansel tech, and typically sky-high overclocking potential. It’s a push.
If you do decide to go with an 8GB RX 580, Sapphire’s customized $250 RX 580 Nitro+ should be on your shortlist for consideration. It’s gorgeous, cool, and extremely quiet without being gigantic, and the extra power connection should come in handy if you plan on overclocking. The $250 price point is comparable to other highly customized 8GB RX 580s being released by other graphics card vendors, and Sapphire’s optimizations are stunning.
Brad Chacos/IDG
Go with the older RX 480 cards if they’re available and you want to save some cash. You won’t notice the performance difference. But at its core, the Radeon RX 580 is still the same Polaris GPU we’re used to from before, so once the cheap Radeon RX 480s dry up, the 4GB version of this newer refresh is still the best $200 graphics card you can buy.
What Is Full Hd – Difference Between Hd Ready And Full Hd Resolution
Researching the right device can be quite a task, especially when you are bombarded with terms like Full HD, HD ready, 4K Ultra HD and more. What do these letters mean? If you are not aware, don’t worry! This article will explain to you what is Full HD and the difference between HD Ready and Full HD resolution.
FHD vs HD explained What is HDHD or High Definition, the new gold standard for image resolution is often being used interchangeably with ‘Full HD’ to describe a product’s image resolution- but it has only led to confusion. Let’s attempt to clear this. The concept of HD has completely changed the level of visual detail and clarity we’ve come to expect from our screens.
What is Full HDFull HD is a term used to denote the resolution of the TV screen. It basically means an image with a resolution of 1920 by 1080 pixels. The measurement of the number of pixels is done by estimating the height and width. So, if a display unit like a TV holds 1920 x 1080p resolution then, it means its height is 1080 pixels and the width is 1920 pixels and the total number of pixels this resolution can carry is 1920 x 1080 = 2073600 pixels. The more the number of pixels, the better picture quality is as the number of pixels together compose a picture on the TV. This resolution is commonly seen in widescreen TVs or monitors with an aspect ratio of 16:9.
What is Ultra HDOn the upper end of the spectrum, there is Ultra HD (UHD or 4K). This image resolution is larger, crisper, and clearer than even 1080p. However, the Ultra HD image resolution hasn’t yet been universally adopted. Why? Although in technical terms “4K” means a horizontal resolution of pixels containing 4096 pixels, there’s no vertical resolution specified for it. So, Ultra HD TV’s are not technically 4K.
Read: 4K vs HDR vs Dolby Vision.
Difference between HD Ready and Full HD resolutionThe primarily difference between HD Ready resolution and Full HD Resolution refers to the actual image size. HD may refer to 720p or 1080p, but Full HD can only refer to 1080p. On the other hand, the phrase HD Ready refers to just 720p. So, when the term ‘HD Ready’ is used to describe a television or monitor/laptop/PC, it means the device has an image resolution of 720p. The term ‘HD’ may also be used. As such, HD Ready image resolution will contain 720 lines of pixels along the vertical axis, and 1,280 lines of pixels along the horizontal axis thereby making the image is 720 pixels tall and 1,280 pixels wide.
This will results in a total pixel count of 921,600, the lowest image resolution that can be considered as high definition.
On the other hand, Full HD resolution means 1080p tall (height) and 1920 pixels wide. This results in a total pixel count of approximately 2 million total pixels.
The more pixels there are in an image, the better because more pixels in each area will allow for an image to contain little to no visible pixels (known as a retina display) allowing sharper visual detail and clarity. In a retina display, there are more pixels in a specific area than can be individually seen by the human eye.
Update the detailed information about Amd Radeon Hd 6990: Serious Inquiries Only, Please on the Daihoichemgio.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!