You are reading the article Google Keep Vs. Onenote Vs. Evernote: We Name The Note updated in February 2024 on the website Daihoichemgio.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 Google Keep Vs. Onenote Vs. Evernote: We Name The Note
Google shook things up last week when it dusted off its old Notebook service and relaunched it as Keep. Google’s new software muscles in on the space currently dominated by Microsoft OneNote and Evernote, two note-taking apps that save your text, Web links, photos, audio recordings, and more, helping to keep your life organized.
Whether you’re about to start using a note-taking app or are considering defecting from your current choice, you must first think about the features you need most. One app may excel at OCR support and another might be best for anywhere access, while a third may be ideal for content sharing within a team. To help you make an informed decision, here’s a closer look at how Google Keep, Microsoft OneNote, and Evernote stack up in a variety of categories.Pricing
Keep on Android
Google Keep is available online and via an Android app. Both iterations are free. OneNote and Evernote have Web and app elements that you can use for free, plus paid premium editions.
OneNote is available as part of a Microsoft Office 365 subscription, starting at $100 per year per home user. It also comes bundled within Office desktop suites starting at $140. As a stand-alone product, OneNote 2013 costs $70. You can use OneNote for free as a Web app through Microsoft SkyDrive, and on Windows Phone, Android, or iOS. The Office version provides additional features, such as the ability to clip screenshots or “print” documents directly to OneNote.
Evernote is free for up to 60MB per month of data. The data cap of the Premium upgrade ($5 per month or $45 per year) jumps to 1GB of bandwidth each month. You also get faster performance, better security, and deeper search capabilities. Evernote for Business gives IT admins oversight and control, with additional collaboration options, for $120 per user per year.
Winner: All three note-taking platforms have free options, so we can’t ding any of the contenders for being overpriced. That said, Evernote’s paid versions offer greater functionality through apps and add-ons.Platforms and ecosystems
Evernote notes on Windows 8
We’ve heard no official confirmation, but it’s reasonable to expect Google to develop iOS and Windows Phone versions of the Keep app eventually. For now, Keep is best for Google-centric users of Google Drive online storage and productivity tools.
Evernote matches Google Keep and OneNote with Web access, and also provides native apps for Android, iOS, Windows Phone, and BlackBerry, in addition to dedicated client software for Windows and Mac OS X. Evernote has developed an extensive community and provides a variety of its own apps as well as third-party apps on its Trunk website.Organization
Content in OneNote, shown in a browser, resides on SkyDrive.
Within a browser, Google Keep lets you view notes as either a list or a grid resembling tidy sticky notes. You can assign colors to notes, but you can’t order or group notes.
OneNote and Evernote, on the other hand, each use a notebook-and-notes metaphor. You can create a notebook for a dedicated topic—such as Website Project, Summer Vacation, or Income Taxes—and then create multiple related notes within it.
OneNote and Evernote also let you tag notes with keywords. You can create separate notebooks in OneNote. Each notebook can contain multiple sections, and each section can have multiple pages and color coding. The desktop version of OneNote also allows you to create a Section Group, the equivalent of embedding a notebook in a notebook. Evernote has a feature similar to the OneNote Section Group, which permits you to group notebooks into Stacks. Evernote Business users can stack professional content within a Business Library.
Winner: Evernote provides more controls for organizing your information.Rich Media
Evernote on an iPhone
Note-taking apps are most powerful when you use them for more than text. Google Keep on the Web lets you add only an image from your PC, while its Android app allows you to capture a picture or an audio clip. Keep transcribes the audio to text, embedding both inside your note.
Features vary according to the hardware and software you have on hand. For example, you can annotate OneNote notes using a digital stylus in either the OneNote desktop version or the OneNote MX app for Windows 8, but only if you have a touchscreen device and a digital stylus to work with.
Winner: Evernote’s ecosystem of apps expands its rich-media possibilities.Text editing
Michelle Mastin OneNote lets you annotate documents and images, as does Evernote.
Although a note-taking tool isn’t meant to replace your word processor, it should make your text look better than a jumble of misaligned characters. After all, you’re trying to get organized.
OneNote on iOS is similar but lacks numbered lists, although the OneNote app for Windows Phone enables numbered lists and text formatting. The Web and Office versions of OneNote both provide more-comprehensive text editing, while the OneNote MX app for Windows 8 uses an innovative radial menu for formatting.
With only color coding for organization, Keep in a browser resembles a Pinterest-style jumble of content.
If you insert a checkbox on Evernote’s Android or iOS app, Evernote automatically adds a checkbox on each line when you tap Enter. On the Web version, in contrast, you have to add the checkbox manually at the beginning of each line; if you try to do it en masse, prepare for heartbreak.
Winner: It makes sense that OneNote, brought to you by the makers of Word software, provides the richest text formatting.Business features
Evernote’s administrator options are user-friendly.
OneNote, on the other hand, supports management features through SharePoint or SkyDrive Pro. The IT admin can manage business data stored there, as well as control user access through Active Directory and Group Policy. You can share notebooks with the whole company, or with designated individuals or teams. Individuals can access their personal OneNote notebooks on SkyDrive, as well as the company notebooks for which they have permission on SharePoint or SkyDrive Pro.
Like OneNote, Evernote Business lets companies manage notes and data related to the business, while allowing individual users to create and maintain personal notes and notebooks outside the grasp of the IT admin.
Winner: Evernote is easier to manage than the SharePoint or SkyDrive Pro back end for OneNote.Data management
Business editions of Office 365 let you share OneNote content with your team.
Be aware that Google can be fickle, as it has axed more than 70 features or services since it began “spring cleaning” in 2011 (RIP, Google Reader).
With either Evernote Business or OneNote used with SharePoint or SkyDrive Pro, business data belongs to the employer and stays under the control of the IT admin. If a user leaves a company, he or she no longer has access to the company notebooks and data, but retains access to their personal notes.
If an Office 365 subscription lapses, the locally installed OneNote software reverts to read-only mode. However, the data still exists through SkyDrive, and you can still use OneNote by way of its Web or mobile apps.
Winner: A tie. All three services provide roughly the same assurances of data ownership, but no means of exporting or archiving your data outside of proprietary formats.The champion
Google Keep, Microsoft OneNote, and Evernote each offer distinctive benefits. Unless you’re Google-focused or Microsoft-centric, however, Evernote is the most diverse and capable service.
Google Keep is nice and simple, but its capabilities are extremely limited.
Winner: Evernote provides users with a powerful note-taking platform for free, along with customization and expanded capabilities through apps and add-ons. Plus, Evernote’s version for businesses is straightforward and affordable.
You're reading Google Keep Vs. Onenote Vs. Evernote: We Name The Note
Why GPL violations are bad – Gary explains
Google has spent billions of dollars on maintaining AOSP and giving you (or anyone) access to the Android source code. That openness has helped thousands of entrepreneurs create brand new companies and technologies with minimal investment. It also has helped already-established companies expand their products without having to invest in an entire operating system first.
In order to make it financially feasible for Google to invest billions in a product it then gives away for free, it needs to monetize Android in some other way. It does this via the Google Mobile Service (GMS), otherwise known as the Google suite of Android apps, including Gmail, YouTube, Chrome, Google Search, and — most significantly — the Google Play Store.
Those proprietary apps are where Google makes its money back (and then some) for its investment into Android.
To be successful, open-source platforms have to painstakingly balance the needs of everyone that uses them. History shows that without rules around baseline compatibility, open-source platforms fragment, which hurts users, developers and phone makers. Android’s compatibility rules avoid this, and help make it an attractive long-term proposition for everyone.
In other words, Android’s open source nature doesn’t thrive on lawless anarchy, but instead on an open-but-regulated balance. With that in mind, it’s hard to agree with a decision to fine Google a whopping $5 billion for trying to keep Android open, free, and thriving.
While it’s easy to be swayed by the impassioned words of a company CEO who has a net worth of over $1.2 billion largely due to the success of Android, one can’t ignore what the European Commission is trying to say before coming to your own conclusion.
In its statement today regarding the $5 billion antitrust fine, the EC says:
Google has used Android as a vehicle to cement the dominance of its search engine. These practices have denied rivals the chance to innovate and compete on the merits.
How has Google “denied rivals the chance to innovate and compete?” The EC argues that Google’s ever-growing restrictions on the GMS and the ever-growing list of apps that become part of the GMS are making the core of Android less useful. This makes it more difficult for competitors within the mobile app industry to stand a chance against Google.
How to change default apps in Android
The EC is worried that Google is repeating that anti-competitive strategy. Already, Google apps dominate the Google Play Store, and even the Play Store itself is the largest online app store in the world. The EC is of the opinion that it has become infeasible for another Android app store to compete with the Play Store — and yes, those do exist.
Since its highly unlikely that Google will stop itself from killing competition by dominating the market through its considerable power over Android, the EC is issuing a $5 billion fine as a way to say, “Stop this, or else.” This makes perfect sense, and is what the European Commission was created to do.
Where do you stand, and what’s the solution?
After reading this, you might know which side you are on. But whether you think Google is within its rights or if the EC is acting in a righteous manner, the question still remains: what should be done to rectify the situation?
The EC’s statement surrounding the $5 billion fine clearly states that Google can create a “reasonable, fair, and objective system” to ensure that Android devices work well with the GMS, without “affecting device manufacturers’ freedom to produce devices based on Android forks.”
NEXT: Google, why don’t you have a reminders app?
USBs have been a real game changer for the world of technology, and they’ve been constantly evolving since the introduction of USB 1.0 in 1996.
Talking about the changes, each generation of USB 3 brought noticeable improvements, which were generally well received by users. The naming convention on the other hand, was a disaster.
Both the official and marketing names were revised multiple times. For instance, USB 3.0 was renamed as USB 3.1 Gen 1, and renamed again as USB 3.2 Gen 1×1. While the latter is the currently used name, some people still prefer the older names, which adds to the confusion.
If you’re (understandably) confused as well, the table below should be helpful.
Original NamesRevised NamesCurrent NamesOld Marketing NameCurrent Marketing NameUSB 3.0USB 3.1 Gen 1USB 3.2 Gen 1×1SuperSpeedSuperSpeed USB 5 Gbit/sUSB 3.1USB 3.1 Gen 2USB 3.2 Gen 2×1SuperSpeed +SuperSpeed USB 10 Gbit/sUSB 3.2USB 3.2 Gen 2×2SuperSpeed USB 20 Gbit/sThe naming of various iterations of USB 3.X
For ease of reading, we’ve organized the sections below in chronological order with the current generation-based naming convention, i.e., USB 3.2 Gen 1×1, 2×1, and 2×2.
USB 3.2 Gen 1×1, originally introduced as USB 3.0 in November 2008, had several significant improvements over USB 2.0, its predecessor.
The revised USB 2.0 standard supported all types of connectors from Type-A to Mini-AB. USB 3.0 dropped support for the mini connectors and instead supported new versions of Type-A, Type-B, Type-C, Micro-A, Micro-B, and Micro-AB connectors.
The USB 3.0 Type-A connectors were backward compatible with the USB 2.0 version. However, this is not the case for the rest of the connectors, as the other versions don’t physically match. You’ll need an adapter to use these USB 3.0 connectors with a USB 2.0 port.
With these connectors, USB 3.0 specified 150 mA or 0.6 W current for one unit load devices, and up to 900mA or 4.5 W for max six load devices at 5 V. Additionally, USB 3.0 ports could bump the available current up to 1.5 A or 7.5 W if implementing the USB Battery Charging Specification.
And most importantly, USB 3.0, which was marketed as SuperSpeed, introduced max transfer speeds of up to 5 Gbit/s, a massive 10x increase from USB 2.0’s Hi-Speed USB.
USB-IF introduced the USB 3.1 standard in 2013, and this is where the rebranding mess began. USB 3.0 was renamed to USB 3.1 Gen 1, while USB 3.1 was marketed as USB 3.1 Gen 2, or SuperSpeed +.
USB 3.1 Gen 1 superseded USB 3.0, meaning it had the same specs, with 5 Gbit/s max bandwidth over a single lane using 8b/10b encoding.
USB 3.1 Gen 2 improved on these specs with a new max data transfer rate up to 10 Gbit/s with 128b/132b encoding. Of course, this was only a theoretical max. But the real-world max speeds were still very impressive at over 7Gbit/s.
While the connector types didn’t change from USB 3.0 to 3.1, one significant difference was the use of USB Power Delivery (PD) standard. The revised USB PD Rev 2.0 standard was released as part of the USB 3.1 suite, which updated USB PD to support various USB-C features such as Alternate Mode.
In terms of power, USB PD introduced Power Rules which defined normative voltage levels at 5 V, 9 V, 15 V, and 20 V. Fixed power profiles were also dropped, meaning power supplies could support maximum source output power ranging anywhere from 0.5 W to 100 W.
USB-IF released USB 3.2 in August 2023, and this is where the naming convention really became an issue. USB 3.0, which was rebranded as USB 3.1 Gen 1, was absorbed by USB 3.2 and once again rebranded as USB 3.2 Gen 1×1.
This can get confusing, but as one of our readers put it, thinking of anything referring to Gen 1 as 3.0 could be an easy way to remember.
Similarly, USB 3.1 was renamed as USB 3.2 Gen 2×1, while USB 3.2 was branded as USB 3.2 Gen 2×2. The old marketing names, SuperSpeed and SuperSpeed + were also changed to SuperSpeed 5 Gbit/s and SuperSpeed 10 Gbit/s. Following this trend, the marketing name for USB 3.2 was SuperSpeed 20 Gbit/s.
As evident from the brand name, USB 3.2 operates with dual-lane differential SuperSpeed pairs and uses 128b/132b encoding to offer max speeds of up to 20 Gbit/s.
Another very noticeable change with USB 3.2 was that it deprecated all connector types aside from the USB Type-C connector. USB-C specifies a symmetrical connector with 12 A pins on top and 12 B pins at the bottom. Because of the rotational symmetry, you needn’t worry about the correct orientation as with other connector types.
The exclusive use of USB-C meant that the implementation of features such as Alternate Mode was also much more prevalent with USB 3.2. For instance, with the DisplayPort alt mode, you could transfer both USB and Video data simultaneously.
To recap, here are the main differences as detailed in the sections above:
USB 3.0USB 3.1USB 3.2Form FactorUSB 3.0 specified the use of Type-A, Type-B, Type-C, Micro-A, Micro-B, and Micro-AB chúng tôi connector types remained consistent in USB 3.1USB 3.2 specified the exclusive use of Type-C, and dropped support for all other connector types.Power DeliveryThe standard USB 3.0 specification supports up to 4.5 W of chúng tôi USB PD, USB 3.1 can support up to 100 W of chúng tôi 3.2 also supports up to 100 W of power with USB PD.Max BandwidthUSB 3.0 supported a theoretical max bandwidth of 5 Gbit/s.USB 3.1 supported a theoretical max bandwidth of 10 Gbit/s.USB 3.2 supported a theoretical max bandwidth of 20 Gbit/s.
Aside from these major technical differences, there are a few more things worth talking about, starting with the pricing. Each iteration of USB 3 saw the use of improved technology, which subsequently meant increased product prices on the customer’s end.
The exact price difference between the generations differs according to the product, but you can always count on the newer generation products with better specs to cost higher than the older ones.
Second, is the matter of appearance. USB 3.0 originally used blue colored ports, whereas USB 3.1 adapted teal colored ports instead. Some manufacturer’s also use purple or violet for USB 3.1 ports.
While in previous iterations of USB, red color was adapted on those ports/connectors which was limited to charging, USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 adapted this color wholly.
Finally, let’s talk about actual implementation. With how immensely popular the USB standard is, implementing a new version worldwide is a herculean task that takes years. USB 2.0 had 8 years to establish itself as a standard.
On the other hand, USB 3.0 only had around 4 years between its introduction and the release of USB 3.1. It’s the same story with USB 3.1 and USB 3.2. In fact, USB 3.2 was the likely the least popular, as by the time it’s implementation actually began in 2023, USB4 was already introduced.
USB4, which is based on the Thunderbolt 3 protocol, is currently the latest and fastest USB standard. Aside from doubling the data signaling rates compared to it’s predecessor, USB4 brought forth numerous improvements, which deserve an article of their own.
As modern devices are already adopting USB4, the implementation of USB 3.2 has been quite limited. Recently, the EU proposed mandatory USB-C, which further impacts the usage of USB 3.0 and USB 3.1 as well.
While this doesn’t bode well for USB 3, it’s likely a good thing for USB in general, and users as well. Even though USB4 products are slightly more expensive, the numerous improvements make it well worth it. And the prospect of a universal connector type is always welcome as well.
Lugging around a notebook full of important passwords and information can be both time consuming and inconvenient. The days of remembering dozens of complex passwords is over when you have a good password manager.
The programs listed below will not only remember your list of passwords for you — all you have to know is the master password to get in — but also secure them through encryption so that even if someone were to get their hands on the raw data, they wouldn’t be able to read your passwords.
Table of Contents
All of these password manager programs have software for Windows, macOS, Android, and iOS, but each one is also unique from the others. You might find one with a feature another doesn’t have, or one that includes a free feature that costs in another password manager.
Before deciding on the best password manager for you, read through the features below to get a feel for what each one offers. Below these short reviews of the top three password managers is our take on which one is the best.LastPass
LastPass includes a wide variety of features and configurations. The free version of LastPass synchronizes with an unlimited number of devices and offers a few extra perks to its paid subscription. What makes this program stand out is its ability to sync passwords and information across all existing devices, which is rare for any “free to use” password manager.
An added bonus to LastPass is the wide range of availability. LastPass doesn’t require a separate download, instead offering a plugin to all major browsers with a full-featured
LastPass also has offline access, the ability to auto-save newly created accounts directly into your LastPass database, can generate answers to security questions, and boasts a really awesome password generator with lots of customizations.
You’d think the features would stop now for free users, but the LastPass free subscription can also typing time.
The automatic password changer is another huge feature in LastPass that might sway you into choosing this password manager over the others. The feature doesn’t work for all websites, but for the ones it does work with, the tool will take control of your mouse and literally change the password for you to something strong, in real time as you watch.
One last thing to remember when making the decision to use LastPass vs 1Password or Dashlane is its ability to hand over your passwords in the event of your death (which is a good thing). You can set up emergency contacts that can request access to your LastPass data, and if you don’t respond to the request before it expires, LastPass will give them access to your account. This is great for families.
You can get LastPass on Windows, Mac, Linux, or your mobile device. It also runs directly from various popular web browsers like Edge, Firefox, and Chrome.1Password
1Password has a nice, modern design that’s really easy to use from a computer or mobile device. This password manager started off being an Apple only application but now works with Windows and Android.
Like most password managers, you can expect unlimited password syncing across all your devices, account access for both online and offline, security alerts, email support, 1 GB of secure online storage, and a password generator.
The family plan for 1Password adds the sharing of passwords, documents, permission controls, and an account-recovery tool. When sharing passwords with family members, you create a shared vault that they have access to from their own account, much like a shared folder of passwords. It’s really handy if multiple people always need access to the same websites from their own computers or phones.
What separates this manager from the others is its Travel Mode feature. When turned on, 1Password will remove any vaults marked as Not Safe for Travel on any device. Once you’ve turned off this mode, all vaults and applications will be restored. This feature protects sensitive data from unauthorized users.
The Windows version works with all major web browsers. However, you can also use 1Password on non-Windows computers via the browser-only extension for Chrome, Firefox, or Opera. What’s more is the standalone 1Password program for Windows or Mac that doesn’t require those browsers.Dashlane
The most expensive, yet extensive manager goes to Dashlane. Dashlane offers a free service as well as two different paid plans: Premium ($60 annually) and Premium Plus ($120 annually). Both paid plans allow an unlimited number of passwords and data storage with breach monitoring. The free version is restricted to a single device and a maximum of 50 saved credentials.
Dashlane Premium includes a wide variety of applications, such as syncing passwords, access across all of your devices, a backup of your account, unlimited password sharing, and two-factor authentication. A big stand out with this manager is its unlimited VPN service and dark-web identity monitoring.
The most extensive option is Dashlane Premium plus. With this upgrade, you can expect features such as credit monitoring, identity-restoration assistance, and identity-theft insurance. However, there are even more features available with Dashlane Business.
Dashlane runs on Windows, Mac, Android, iOS, and Linux.The Verdict
The choice of a password managers is no simple task. The answer ultimately comes down to your personal lifestyle —how much you’re willing to spend and which features are important to you.
If you’re willing to pay for extra features, we suggest Dashlane. With its unlimited VPN service and dark-web monitoring, you can be sure that no important information will be leaked to identity thieves in search for their next victim. Dashlane’s Premium plus extends its reach in security and customer service with its continuous credit monitoring and identity-theft insurance.
For those who want a the most out of a free service, LastPass should be your go-to. With services often cut from other free password managers, LastPass does an excellent job of bringing a smooth, yet elegant interface to many different operating systems.
Where 1Password lacks in flashy designs, it makes up for in simplicity, and Apple fans will for sure enjoy its user-friendly interface. Travel Mode is where it exceeds expectations, letting you secure your data from prying eyes when traveling. However, if you tend to use other applications or prefer to have more options, we suggest going with LastPass or
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite review: An affordable flagship done right
So now that there are two affordable options from Samsung at comparative price points, which one is better for you? What are you missing if you pick one over the other, and, more importantly, which one gives you more bang for your buck? We discuss these points in the Android Authority comparison of the Samsung S10 Lite vs the Note 10 Lite.
There’s a certain homegeneity in design that permeates Samsung’s products. The Galaxy S10 Lite and Note 10 Lite embody this wholeheartedly. In fact, the two phones would fit right in with Samsung’s new S20 series of phones.
Up front the designs are exceedingly similar, which makes it hard to differentiate between them. Other than the minor difference in physical sizes, the two phones are nigh identical —down to the centrally mounted punch hole selfie camera.
The backs of both phones are fingerprint magnets, and keeping them clean is a hassle.
Both phones have extremely fingerprint-prone back panels. You’ll find Samsung’s “glass-tic” material here — a polycarbonate blend of sorts that makes the material feel like glass, but not quite enough. It is nearly impossible to keep clean. I’m not a fan.
Galaxy S10 Lite
Galaxy Note 10 Lite
Pit against each other, the performance difference is very obvious to see using benchmark figures. The Snapdragon 855 chipset in the S10 Lite scores far higher than the Note 10 Lite’s Exynos 9810.
The Exynos 9810 in the Note 10 Lite is a generation older than the Snapdragon 855 in the S10 Lite.
Elsewhere, RAM and storage options are essentially the same. Each comes with either 6GB or 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. The S10 Lite does get an additional 8GB/512GB variant. Regardless, storage on both phones can be expanded using a microSD card, albeit at the expense of a second SIM card slot. Yes, both phones have a hybrid SIM slot.
The Galaxy S10 Lite and Note 10 Lite run Android 10 with the latest version of One UI 2.0. Samsung has really picked up the pace with feature additions, and both devices have already received the latest security patch issued by Google. One UI in itself is a polished experience and strikes a good balance between fluidity and feature set.
Galaxy S10 Lite
Galaxy Note 10 Lite
Battery capacities on both phones are identical at 4,500mAh. Charging speeds, however, are very different. The S10 Lite supports 45W fast charging while the Note 10 Lite is capped at 25W.
Battery life isn’t an issue on either phone, but the S10 Lite offers much faster 45W charging.
On average, I could easily get a full day of battery life out of either phone. However, the S10 Lite was a bit more frugal while on standby. This resulted in overall longer battery life. Neither phone will have you worrying before the end of the day, but the S10 Lite will get you that extra range when you’re out late without a charger on hand.
Galaxy S10 Lite
48MP (f/2.0) primary
Galaxy Note 10 Lite
The pixel-binned 12MP shot from the S10 Lite looks just a bit cleaner with slightly more pronounced bokeh effect. However, the color accuracy is completely off. It imparts an almost pink hue to the flower. Meanwhile, the shot from the Note 10 Lite wasn’t as sharp, but it comes close to the actual color of the flower.
Indoors, things are a bit different. The S10 Lite’s pixel-binned camera is able to brighten low-light images that are low on noise and have more natural looking colors. The image captured by the Note 10 Lite appears a bit washed out in comparison.
Shooting ultrawide, there is a very noticeable difference in how the two cameras approach exposure and imaging. The S10 Lite opts for a lower exposure to retain more details in the clouds and shadow regions. The Note 10 Lite’s shot turned out to be blown out and displayed blown out highlights. Neither phone was perfect, and the actual setting was somewhere halfway between the two exposure values chosen by the phones.
Overall, the two cameras are good enough for the category and excel in different ways.
Video specs are fairly matched across the two. Both phones are capable of capturing 4K at 60fps video following recent updates.
Overall, the two cameras are good enough for the category, and excel in different ways. The S10 Lite is the one to get if you often find yourself shooting in low light. Meanwhile, the Note 10 Lite’s shooter takes more color accurate images outdoors, and is generally a more versatile set-up to boot. You can take a look at full resolution image samples here.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
8GB RAM/128GB storage — 39,999 rupees (~$550)
8GB RAM/512GB storage — 44,999 rupees (~$620)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite
8GB RAM/128GB storage — 40,999 rupees (~$570)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite
See price at Amazon
Samsung S10 Lite vs Note 10 Lite: Which one should I get?
It has taken a while for Samsung to make a proper showing in the affordable flagship segment, but the Galaxy S10 Lite and Galaxy Note 10 Lite are very good devices. They don’t have the absolute latest spec sheets and instead focus on providing just enough paired with a cohesive user experience.
The Galaxy S10 Lite gives you a near-flagship level experience. It is a true return to form for the company and delivers oodles of power, a very good software experience, and cameras that can, for the most part, hold up to the competition. Between the faster Snapdragon 855 chipset, the quicker 45W charging, and the generally better battery life, it makes for an excellent phone. This will likely be the preferred option for most users.
The S10 Lite edges out the Note 10 Lite as the better device unless the S Pen is an essential feature for you.
Meanwhile, the Galaxy Note 10 Lite is for anyone who wants the Galaxy Note 10 Plus experience without spending flagship money. The performance is squarely 2023, but that certainly doesn’t make it a slouch. Additionally, it is the only value flagship around with stylus input. If you want an excellent note-taking device, this is practically your only option. You can’t really go wrong with it.
Redmi Note 9 Pro vs Realme 6: Comparison Design: Glass back vs Polycarbonate Back
For starters, the Redmi Note 9 Pro features a glass back, covered with Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection. It is available in Glacier White, Aurora Blue, and Interstellar Black color options with subtle glossy, gradient patterns.
Both the devices get a side-mounted fingerprint scanner and punch-hole notch upfront. However, Note 9 Pro has a few extra features, including IR blaster and notification LED.
As for ergonomics, Realme 6 is smaller and lighter of the duo at 191 grams, compared to the former’s 209-gram weight. Hence, it’s more comfortable for single-hand use.Display: 60Hz vs 90Hz
In comparison, the Realme 6 comes with a tad smaller 6.50-inch IPS display with a Full-HD+ resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and an aspect ratio of 20:9. The panel gets a high 90Hz refresh rate, giving it an edge in terms of overall smoothness and gaming experience. This one, too, gets the Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection, though.Processor: Snapdragon 720G vs MediaTek Helio G90T
Powering the Note 9 Pro at its core is the new Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G. It’s an octa-core chipset that employs two Kryo 465 Gold cores clocked at 2.3GHz, and six Kryo 465 Silver cores clocked at 1.8GHz, built on the 8nm process. Graphics duties are handled by the Adreno 618 GPU. Plus, it has NavIC support.
In contrast, the Realme 6 gets its power from MediaTek Helio G90T SoC. It’s an octa-core processor with dual Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0GHz. It bears Mali-G76 MC4 GPU.Software: MIUI vs ColorOS
The Redmi Note 9 Pro runs MIUI 11 on top of Android 10. Whereas, the Realme 6 runs the new RealmeUI based on the latest Android version. With the transition from ColorOS to RealmeUI, the user interface has become a lot cleaner and closer to stock Android on Realme. On the contrary, the MIUI still feels heavily skinned and intrusive.
Having said that, both the phones are loaded with a lot of bloatware apps. You’ll also witness spammy notifications from system apps, which can be annoying at times.Cameras: 48MP Quad vs 64MP Quad Setup
The Redmi Note 9 Pro features a quad camera setup with a 48-megapixel primary Samsung ISOCELL GM2 sensor with f/1.79 aperture and an 8-megapixel 120° ultra-wide-angle lens. There’s also a 5-megapixel 2cm macro lens and a 2MP depth sensor. For selfies, it has a single 16-megapixel shooter upfront.
Both phones have excellent cameras on offer. Realme 6 usually performs better in most situations, including low-light. Though, the latter triumphs in macro photography and selfie department.Battery: Larger Capacity vs Faster Charging
The Redmi Note 9 Pro outperforms the Realme 6 in terms of overall battery endurance with its higher 5,020mAh capacity, compared to the 4,300mAh cell on the latter. The difference widens further when you use the Realme 6 on 90Hz refresh rate mode.
Anyway, it compensates for the smaller battery with its 30W VOOC 4.0 flash charging, which juices up the phone from scratch to 100% within an hour. In comparison, the Note takes about two hours for a full recharge with the bundled 18W charger.Price: Same for the base model
Similarly, Realme 6 starts at Rs. 12,999 for the 4GB RAM and 64GB internal storage. However, it gets a 6/64GB version priced at Rs. 14,999, accompanied by an 8/128GB option, which retails for Rs. 15,999.Redmi Note 9 Pro vs Realme 6- Which is better?
The Realme 6 seems to offer better value with its 90Hz display, tad better cameras, and faster-charging speeds on offer. It’s also lighter and more comfortable to use. But then again, the Redmi Note 9 Pro hits right back with its bigger battery, premium glass build, and features like IR blaster and notification light. You can choose either of the two based on your priorities.
Also, read- Redmi Note 9 Pro vs Realme 6 Pro: Specs, Features & Price Comparison
Update the detailed information about Google Keep Vs. Onenote Vs. Evernote: We Name The Note on the Daihoichemgio.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!