You are reading the article How Smartphones Conquered The Tech World updated in December 2023 on the website Daihoichemgio.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 How Smartphones Conquered The Tech World
The Mobile World Congress in Barcelona has become the most important technology trade show. And the reason is that smartphones have become the most important technology product.
While attending the show this week, it became obvious to me that even products that are not smartphones must become like smartphones — or must connect to smartphones — in order to stay relevant and survive.
I noticed that here at the show, a huge number of iPhone users were using and talking about Mailbox, a new email client currently available only for iPhones. And I’ve been using it myself.
What’s interesting about Mailbox is that it doesn’t add any capabilities to email. There’s nothing you can do with Mailbox that you can’t do with any desktop, tablet or other smartphone client.
What Mailbox represents is the first-ever purely multi-touch interface email client. Rather than being about folders and menus, Mailbox lets you do what would otherwise be multi-step processes with a single swipe in one direction or another.
Many users, including myself, are now choosing to process our email on our iPhones even when we’re sitting in front of a full PC.
One by one, applications on touch devices, especially smartphones, are becoming superior in usability to desktop alternatives.
It used to be that smartphones were an important category of technology because everyone has one and because they go with us everywhere.
But now, they’re also becoming superior because software designers are figuring out how to really use the multi-touch user interface, which is and should be superior in usability to the old-school PC user interfaces involving mice, keyboards, menus, folders and all the rest.
An early example of this is Apple’s own iPhoto for iOS. It’s theoretically the iOS version of Apple’s iPhoto for OS X. In reality, it works nothing like the desktop version at all. It’s better, at least for average users, and that superiority is the result of the multi-touch user interface.
Yesterday, Adobe demonstrated that it, too, understands the power of multi-touch by launching Photoshop Touch for iPhone and Android smartphones. For editing smartphone photos, some photographers will actually prefer this app to the full-sized and over-priced desktop version, which nowadays makes sense only for professionals.How Smartphones Became the Computer for the Rest of Us
Just as Apple changed its named years ago from Apple Computer, Inc., to Apple, Inc. and changed its business from a mostly PC company to a mostly mobile company, so will the whole PC industry if they want to survive.
The leader in this trend beyond Apple is China’s Lenovo. The company says that it’s one of the few smartphone makers that’s profitable, and analysts expect the company to grow its market share in China this year to surpass Samsung and become the number-one smartphone vendor in China.
You’ll recall that Lenovo was a PC nobody until it bought IBM’s PC business in 2005. Lenovo was smart enough to get into PCs then and smart enough to focus on smartphones now.
I think this is the route to survival for every company that makes most of its money from PCs — become a smartphone company or die.
Nowadays, ordinary users don’t care that much about high-performance PCs. They’re looking for other factors, such as big screens for desktops or ultra-mobility for laptops.
Sure, PC gaming is on the rise again, and gamers care. A lot. Supergeeks and power users will always care. But ordinary users don’t care about PC performance as much as they used to.
Here at Mobile World Congress, the ultra-fast smartphones dominate the conversations. The smartphone is the new PC.
The fast-growing Chinese company Huawei (pronounced wah-way) blew away its Mobile World Congress audience by introducing the Huawei Ascend P2, which it claims is the fastest smartphone ever created.
Another darling of the show is the new HTC One, which that company rolled out with dozens of tethered units for attendees to fondle. Powered by a quad-core, 1.7GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 600, the HTC One is another blistering-fast phone, which is one of its best selling points.
You're reading How Smartphones Conquered The Tech World
Digital technology has transformed many aspects of healthcare, but when it comes to clinical communications and workflows, many hospitals are still stuck using yesterday’s tech.
While some hospitals are moving ahead and leveraging mobile devices and apps in innovative ways, for many there is a perception that it is too complex and too expensive. This is exactly the problem that Samsung has set out to address with its multiuse smartphone solutions for clinicians.Clinician Tech Overload
Nurses and clinicians have an extremely challenging job. They have multiple responsibilities, they are always on the go, and always multitasking. To accomplish all these tasks, they juggle an array of different devices: from communications pendants, pagers and desk phones, to handheld scanners and aging computer terminals.
Put yourself in the nurses’ shoes and imagine you’re trying to accomplish your job while using a different device for almost every task. There is an enormous amount of inefficiency caused by this fragmented technology strategy.
This is not just a problem for clinicians. For the hospital IT leaders, managing all these different systems and devices has become a burden on budget and staffing.A Smarter Solution
Samsung multiuse smartphones offer a smarter solution. Samsung has partnered with the leading healthcare software providers who deliver solutions for clinical communications, mobile electronic health records (EHR) access, secure single-sign-on, scanning and other capabilities to seamlessly integrate them on a single smart mobile device.
Modernize Your Hospital With Mobility
Discover the latest mobile solutions and best practices for clinical communications in this webinar. Download Now
The Samsung multiuse solution leverages Imprivata for secure single sign-on, so clinicians can unlock their smartphones with the tap of a badge. They don’t have to enter a password or PIN, or even stop long enough to remove their gloves. Then they can use the same device for everything from clinical communications, to barcode scanning, to EHR access. That means no more trips back to the nurses’ station to view and edit patient records. Instead, nurses can quickly check and update records on the go, ensuring that patient data stays up to date for everyone else on the care team.
If nurses need a larger screen or keyboard for charting, they can now have a desktop experience without a desktop computer. Instead, they simply plug their smartphones into a Samsung DeX workstation and access a Citrix virtual desktop, which gives them full access to hospital applications and information systems, including EHR. This saves nurses time and helps them have more informed interactions with patients. They can also connect their smartphone to hospital room smart TVs to share information directly with patients.Lightening the Load for IT
For hospital IT, security is a top concern. All Samsung smartphones have Samsung Knox built in from the chip up. This defense-grade security platform keeps patient data safe. Meanwhile, Knox Configure and Knox Mobile Enrollment let IT departments deploy Samsung Galaxy phones — already preconfigured with the desired applications and settings — quickly and at scale.
With the Samsung multiuse solution, clinicians no longer need laptops, desktops, pagers or communications pendants to communicate and access information. That means IT no longer needs to secure and manage all those devices. This lowers IT costs and increases efficiency.
Samsung makes integrations easy by working with leading clinical communications vendors and EHR providers to ensure their solutions work seamlessly on the multiuse devices.
Worried about the cost? Samsung has a broad portfolio of products, starting from the Galaxy A series all the way to the flagship Galaxy S and Note devices. There’s a device for every budget, and hospitals can leverage the same multiuse solution on them all.
How smart are your hospital’s clinical communications? Find out by taking a quick assessment, or download your free complete guide to modernizing clinical communications with smartphones.
Learning how to create a 3D globe with the world map in Illustrator is quite easy to do and remember. This project can also be the start of another project on how to make this 3D globe revolve. For now, the aim is to create a 3D globe with a world map on it.
Open and prepare Illustrator
Add map image to symbols
Create a circle with the Ellipse tool
Cut the circle in half
Use 3D revolve
Editing the 3D art
Save1] Prepare items
Any successful project has a lot of preparation going into it. You can’t get everything right but when there is a lot of preparation, lots of mistakes and delays can be avoided. Decide on what the Globe will be used for, this will help with the resolution, color mode, and size chosen in the beginning. The globe may be created so that it can be easily incorporated into multiple projects like a template. Decide if you want just a map outline, minute details, or full details. Decide on what part of the map you want to show. This is important since the globe will not be revolving so only one side will show. When these are decided, it is time to search and find the image of the map. Find an image that is of a very high resolution and quality. Depending on the plans you have for the finished product, it would be wise to make sure that the license of the image supports the use that you plan for it.2] Open and prepare Illustrator
When all the preparation is done, it is now time to open and use Illustrator. Open Illustrator and prepare the canvas. While in Illustrator go to File then New and a New document dialogue window will open. In the new document dialogue box, you will choose the options that you want. The decisions you made in the preparation step will affect what options are chosen in the new document window. A dimension of Width 1600 px and Height 1600 px can be used. You are free to make it bigger or smaller. The resolution will depend on what you want to do with the globe when you are done. A Raster effect (resolution) of 72 ppi is ok for RGB that will be used for screens only. The higher resolutions are better for printing, medium is good for times when it will be both print and screen or when you are undecided. Remember that the higher the resolution the larger the file size.3] Add map image to symbols pallet
This step will require that you place the map in the symbol pallet so that it can be added to the sphere that will be created. To get the map image into the symbols pallet, you can drag and drop the map image into Illustrator and then drag and drop it into the document you are working on. You may also go to File then Open, when the dialogue box appears, search for the image, then choose the image that you want and press Open.4] Create a circle with the Ellipse tool
Now it is time to create the globe, this will start with the Ellipse tool.
When the circle is created to your specification, give it color so that it is easier to see.5] Cut the circle in half
You will be left with half of the circle.6] Use 3D revolve
Check the Preview option to make the changes happen on the image when you make them in the 3D revolve options window. You will notice that the half circle has become a sphere. That is where the world map will fit, and it will look like a globe.7] Map art
Completed globe with the map of the world.8] Editing the 3D art
There may be reasons to want to edit the 3D image after you have closed the 3D effects window. to make changes to the 3D effect do not go back to the effects option at the top menu bar. Look for 3D Revolve at the Appearance panel on the right. It is usually above the Layers panel. It will only be visible if the image is selected.9] Save
The hard work is finished, and it is now time to save. You should have been saving the image periodically while you work. You would go to File then Save as and in the Save as dialogue box choose a name and save the file as an Illustrator .ai file. This will make it editable. To save for other uses when you are finished, go to File then Export, and choose JPEG or another file format that you want.
Read: How to convert Photo to Watercolor Painting in PhotoShopHow do you make a 3D planet in Illustrator?
You can use the 3D Tool in Illustrator to create a sphere in Illustrator draw a circle and cut that circle into a half circle. Then add the 3D revolve effect and the half circle will become a sphere. You even have some control over the surface texture and the light source. You can then choose the Map art option to add a symbol onto the sphere. If you want a map of the world on the sphere, find the image and drag it into the symbols pallet. When you go to the Map art option, go to the Symbol option, and choose the world map. The map will be placed on the sphere.
Read: How to make 3D Vector Globe in IllustratorHow do you make a global sphere in Illustrator?
But how many of them are willing to spend the money it takes to ensure that their products hold up after the sale has been made, and to service the product if it breaks?
Those are important questions for customers to ask before they buy–and the key questions of our annual Reliability and Service Survey. Each year we survey thousands of our readers to find out which hardware manufacturers have the best–and worst–product reliability and customer service and support.
This year’s response was unprecedented: 79,000 of you rated the tech products you use. With such a large pool of survey data, we learned a great deal about the companies that make laptops, desktops, smartphones, HDTVs, cameras, and printers. Here’s the mile-high view of what we found.
–Put simply, products made by Apple, Asus, Brother, and Canon are typically reliable and well supported.
–Products made by Dell and Hewlett-Packard often aren’t, especially if you’re a home user.
–Laptops are slightly more reliable than before, and have fewer serious problems than desktops.
–Business PC customers are generally more satisfied than their consumer counterparts.
And there’s much, much more.
After you read this article, you may want to jump to PCWorld’s Facebook page, where readers can add their own stories of product reliability and vendor service.Winners and Losers
Apple once again smoked the competition in the desktop, notebook, and smartphone categories, winning high praise from customers in all reliability and service categories. The Macintosh and iPhone maker did so well that virtually all its scores were above average. Apple’s only average scores were related to the company’s deftness at replacing failed notebook components, and in two areas pertaining to serious problems with the iPhone, the latter perhaps stemming from the iPhone 4’s well-publicized antenna issue that resulted in dropped calls for some users.
Asus did well in ratings among both desktop and laptop owners, though it is best known in North America for its low-cost netbooks. These mini-notebooks have often been the target of derision over the past two years, with critics calling them cheaply made and hard to use. While some netbooks may fit that description, our readers say that Asus portables are, in general, highly reliable.
Canon, which like Apple, is a perennial favorite of PCWorld readers, again rocked the printer and camera categories. It’s not alone at the top, however. In our survey, Panasonic has surpassed Canon in camera reliability, and Brother is gaining popularity among printer users.
Panasonic, the biggest proponent of plasma HDTVs in a market increasingly dominated by LCD models, has a slight edge over LG and Sony. And smartphone users, in addition to praising the iPhone, are particularly happy with Verizon Wireless cell service and with handsets built by HTC. Research In Motion’s BlackBerry phones, however, get low marks for ease of use.
Dell and HP, two of the tech industry’s largest hardware manufacturers, disappointed us this year, particularly in desktops and laptops for home use and (in HP’s case) printers. (We address these two companies’ dismal showings below.)
Overall, it’s clear that many reliability and service problems persist, including defective components that fail out of the box, as well as poorly trained customer service representatives who are incapable of departing from a script.Golden Apple
Can Apple do no wrong? Indeed, 2010 was a remarkable year for the world’s highest-valued tech company. In addition to unveiling the iPad, a touchscreen tablet that launched a new genre of mobile computing devices, Apple enjoyed record sales and profits. And now it’s won the trifecta by smoking the competition in our reader poll.
IDC computer analyst Bob O’Donnell attributes Apple’s popularity to the company’s stylish, well-made computers and its easy-to-use operating system. “It’s a combination of having high-quality hardware–you pay a premium for it–and a software experience that’s more straightforward,” he says. “And if you have fewer questions, you typically have fewer problems.”
Apple is very good at offering extras too. “You have things like the Genius Bar at all the Apple stores. People literally walk in with their systems, and the [support] guy sits there and says, ‘Oh, yeah, you’ve got to do this, this, and this,’” O’Donnell adds. “It gives you a warm, fuzzy feeling: ‘They’re taking care of me.’ Nobody has anything close to that on the PC side.”Asus Ascends
The impressive showing by Asus caught our attention as well. This Taiwan-based manufacturer sells an assortment of desktops, such as its all-in-one EeeTop models, and full-size notebooks. But its Eee PC family of mini-notebooks “pioneered the whole netbook concept,” according to ABI Research, and remains the company’s claim to fame, at least in North America.
Our survey doesn’t distinguish between netbooks and laptops, but industry analysts say that any distinction between those categories is irrelevant where reliability is concerned. According to ABI Research analyst Jeff Orr, “Netbooks are made by the same vendors on the same assembly lines as laptop computers. I am not seeing any significant quality differences between netbooks and laptops that use comparable materials. One could argue that lower-cost materials are being substituted, but again this is not being seen.”
Asus shipped 396,000 portable PCs in the United States in the third quarter of 2010, and 201,000 of those were netbooks, according to technology industry research firm IDC. Netbooks may get a bad rap as shoddily built machines, but our survey results suggest this isn’t the case–at least not with Asus gear.Dell and HP: No More Excuses
Combined, Dell and HP ship nearly half of all PCs sold in the U.S. According to tech industry research firm IDC, HP had just over 24 percent of the American PC market and Dell owned 23 percent in the third quarter of 2010. (Apple and Acer placed a distant third and fourth, each holding 10-plus percent.)
Year after year, readers proclaim HP one of the biggest losers in our Reliability and Service Survey. In 2004, for instance, HP and its Compaq brand were rated last in desktops, and next to last in notebooks and digital cameras. (HP did well that year in printers, however.) The company improved in 2005, earning average grades overall, but then fizzled again in 2007, 2008, and 2009.
Dell’s scorecard has varied over the years, but recent trends are troubling. Its second-to-last laptop ranking in 2009 (only HP did worse) shows a marked decline from 2004 and 2005.Making Bank on Mediocre?
Although Dell lost $4 million on its consumer business in the first half of 2010, the company made a total profit of $886 million during that time (that’s 16 percent more than it made in the same period last year). Dell’s lines for small and medium-size businesses accounted for much of its total profits: $636 million, a 34 percent increase from the first half of 2009.
Over at HP, the company’s Personal Systems Group–which includes desktop and notebook PCs, workstations, and handheld devices–saw a year-over-year earnings increase of 18 percent to $1.46 billion for the nine-month period ending July 31, 2010, according to an HP filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company’s Imaging and Printing Group, which sells HP’s home printers, had a 1.66 percent earnings boost to $3.19 billion in the same period.
Meanwhile, several of Dell and HP’s smaller competitors have maintained high survey scores year after year, despite competing in the same cutthroat markets as the Big Two. Asus and Toshiba, which duke it out with Dell and HP in the ultracompetitive Windows laptop market, earned high marks from our readers this year.
That raises the question: If Dell and HP have a profitable business model–one that has enabled them to control half of the U.S. PC market–are they sufficiently motivated to improve their support operations?
They should be. PC and peripheral manufacturers sell in a crowded market, and a customer with an unpleasant support experience is soon a former customer.
HP officials we spoke with expressed surprise at its poor showing in PCWorld’s Reliability and Service Survey. The company has shown improvement recently in similar surveys, they say, including one from the American Customer Satisfaction Index, a University of Michigan business school study based on customer evaluations of the quality of goods and services bought in the United States.
“We’re not happy until all of our customers are happy,” says HP customer service executive Cliff Wagner. “There’s clearly a lot of work that we’re continuing to do, and a lot of investments that we’re doing.”
Those investments include two new customer service and technical support centers in Conway, Arkansas, and Rio Rancho, New Mexico, Wagner says, although both facilities won’t be fully staffed for at least two more years.
“We have not lost our focus on making sure that we’re building customers for life,” adds Jodi Schilling, vice president of HP customer support in North America. “We’re continuing to make investments, not only in the support experience but also in product development.”
If there’s a glimmer of hope for HP, it’s that users who bought machines within the last 12 months were much happier with the company’s support of home desktops and notebooks. (Our one-year chart includes only survey respondents who have bought a PC or printer in the last 12 months.)
It’s possible that HP’s service and support operation devotes more resources to newer customers, resulting in higher satisfaction levels for this group.
Dell’s 12-month results show little change, with home desktops and laptops that aren’t particularly reliable, but with printers that are. Dell business laptops did get higher reliability grades on the one-year chart, but not enough to boost Dell’s standing vis-à-vis the competition.
This year we separated Dell and HP business and home users in the laptop, desktop, and printer categories, in order to compare the satisfaction levels of the vendors’ corporate and consumer customers. For a discussion of the results, see “2010 Reliability and Service: Laptops and Desktops.”It Takes Only One Frustrating Incident
IDC’s O’Donnell points out that the home market is a challenge to support. But home users aren’t simpletons either, and their frustrations are often born from bad support experiences rather than from self-inflicted slip-ups.
Dan Keller, a medical journalist in Glenside, Pennsylvania, bought an HP Pavilion desktop about three years ago. The CD drive faceplate arrived broken, and HP has yet to replace it, despite his many go-rounds with customer support, he says.
“It wasn’t a run-of-the-mill problem, and they said, ‘That part doesn’t exist,’” Keller says with a laugh. “I said, ‘Well, you’re putting them on computers, they have to exist.’”
Despite the unresolved faceplate issue, Keller’s desktop runs fine. But the frustrating support incident, combined with the poor keyboard layout and other design quirks of an HP laptop he bought recently from Costco (he has since returned it), has soured him on the vendor. “At this point, with two goofy machines, I think I would shy away from HP again,” he says.Survey Methodology
It’s important to note that our survey results don’t necessarily represent the opinions of a given company’s customers as a whole. And because our data comes only from PCWorld readers who chose to take the survey, our results don’t necessarily reflect the opinions of PCWorld readers in general.What the Measures Mean
PCWorld readers rated hardware vendors in six product categories: desktops; notebooks; cameras; HDTVs; printers; and smartphones. Each category (excluding smartphones) had 5 to 9 measurements, each ranking a vendor relative to its competitors. In each measure, we determined whether the vendor’s score was significantly better (s), not significantly different (u), or significantly worse (t) than the average of its peers.
The five reliability measures spotlighted problems with such things as failed components (e.g., a notebook hard drive) or problems that occurred right away or “out of the box.” Among those measurements are two that score our respondents’ overall satisfaction with their vendors’ hardware reliability and customer support.
If a vendor received fewer than 50 responses in a subsection, we discarded the results as statistically insignificant. This threshold prevented us from rating some smaller companies. The measurements in our smartphones category were a bit more comprehensive. We rated smartphone makers using on four reliability measurements and five ease-of-use measurements. For the wireless carriers that sell the smartphones, we measured five different aspects of their customer support, as well as two aspects of their network performance – wireless internet service quality and voice call quality.Reliability Measures
Problems on arrival (all devices): Based on the percentage of survey respondents who reported any problem with the device out of the box.
Any significant problem (all devices): Based on the percentage of survey respondents who reported any problem at all during the product’s lifetime.
Any failed component replaced (laptop and desktop PCs): Based on the percentage of survey respondents who reported replacing one or more original components because the components had failed.
Core component problem (laptop and desktop PCs): Based on the percentage of survey respondents who reported problems with the processor, motherboard, power supply, hard drive, system memory, or graphics board/chip at any time during the life of their laptop or desktop PC.
Severe problem (HDTVs, phones, cameras, and printers): Based on the percentage of survey respondents who reported a problem that rendered their device impossible to use.
Ease of use (HDTVs, phones, cameras, and printers): Based on the percentage of survey respondents who rated their device as extremely or very easy to use.
Overall satisfaction with reliability (all devices): Based on the owner’s overall satisfaction with the reliability of the device.Service Measures
Phone hold time: Based on the average time a product’s owners waited on hold to speak to a phone support representative.
Average phone service rating: Based on a cumulative score derived from product owners’ ratings of several aspects of their experience in phoning the company’s technical support service. Among the factors considered were whether the information was easy to understand, and whether the support rep spoke clearly and knowledgeably.
In-person service rating (phones only): Based on a cumulative score derived from phone owners’ ratings of several aspects of technical support received at a service provider’s retail location. Among the factors considered were the ease of getting a representative’s attention in the store, and the knowledge, fairness, and attitude of the rep..
Problem was never resolved: Based on the percentage of survey respondents who said the problem remained after they contacted the company’s support service.
Service experience: Based on a cumulative score derived from product owners’ responses to a series of questions focusing on 11 specific aspects of their experience with the company’s service department.
By 1933, World War II was well underway so naval experts busied themselves by coming up with better combat technology. Engineers planned that the H.M.S. Gotland, a Swedish cruiser, would come equipped with a canvas landing strip for seaplanes. While kept afloat by pontoons the landing field would pick up seaplanes while the cruiser was moving at full speed. A rotating catapult on the deck would be capable of launching planes in any direction. Alas, the canvas landing field never caught on, and seaplanes aboard the Gotland suffered damage caused by wave turbulence. In 1944, the cruiser was converted into an anti-aircraft cruisers. After the war, the Swedish military used her as a training center. Read the full story in “Canvas Landing Field for Seaplanes”.
For as long as ships have been around, naval powers have competed for supremacy on the seas. After the steam engine’s invention in the 19th century, warship design underwent a major upheaval, culminating in an arms race for the best battleships and cruisers. Some of these ships went on to become famed World War I and II icons. Others never made it past the blueprint stage. You’ll find that when it comes to naval warfare, the Popular Science archives favor both the formidable and the funny speculations, as long as they contribute to a bright (Allied) future.
World War I was the era of Dreadnoughts, or big-gun battle ships powered by steam turbines. During the interwar period, Great Britain and Germany emerged as the two leading contenders for naval supremacy. Even though the Treaty of Versailles limited Germany’s navy to a series of minor, weight-controlled ships, German engineers still managed to release a few deceptively lightweight vessels into Allied waters. Their heavily-armed pocket battleships changed history while serving during the Second World War, but for other projects, like Germany’s proposed submarine cruiser, the time simply wasn’t right.
Just because a ship didn’t make headlines doesn’t mean it couldn’t capture our imaginations. The interwar and postwar periods led us to wonder what the next great conflict would look like. Could we merge battleships and submarines? Could we design supercarriers capable of holding jet bombers? Two decades before the Navy promoted aircraft carriers to capital ship of the fleet, engineers experimented with a converted tanker that could dock airships in mid-flight. Italy, still years away from becoming a major Axis power, released plans for a semi-submersible equipped with 18-inch guns and a superstructure coated in cork.
Union Square’s U.S.S. Recruit: August 1917
During World War I, the US Navy commissioned a land-based dreadnought battleship as a recruiting and training center for the New York city district. Located in Manhattan’s Union Square and christened the U.S.S. Recruit, or the Landship Recruit, this fully rigged battleship accommodated 39 bluejacket guards from the Newport Training Station under the command of Acting Captain C.F. Pierce. Every day, crew members would live as though they were at sea: the would do laundry, clean the deck, attend classes, and stand guard. Meanwhile, regular citizens would tour the ship to improve their understanding of life aboard a warship. As you can see from the left, the U.S.S. recruit contained waiting rooms, doctor’s offices, shower rooms, and even a ventilating device to regulate temperature. As far as weaponry goes, the ship used several wooden models of guns to represent rifles and naval guns. The New York Times reported that the Navy recruited 25,000 men through the ship. After the War, the Recruit was decommissioned and dismantled for a planned relocation to Coney Island, but to this day, no one knows what fate befell it. Read the full story in “The ‘Recruit’ — Our Only Land Battleship”
From Gunboat to Cargo Boat: November 1920
Gunboats are a warship used for carrying guns to assist in coastal combat. During the first World War, the Kilmore served as a gunboat for the Royal Navy, and afterward, she was converted into a cargo ship capable of holding 570 tons of cargo at a speed of ten knots. The image at the top left shows the Kilmore in her original form while the image below shows the modifications. During wartime, the Kilmore’s stern-shaped bow made it difficult for enemy fleets to tell whether she was coming or going. As a cargo ship, she had a reduced deck with a mast where the false stern use to be. The project was such a hit that a similar conversion was planned for seven other ships in her class. Read the full story in “A Gunboat in War–A Merchantman in Peace”
Catching Airships: November 1924
The interwar period is characterized by social turmoil and political unrest. To prepare for the Second World War, the Navy conducted maneuvers for testing the usefulness of airships in maritime combat. They fashioned ships such as the converted tanker Patoka, pictured left, with mooring masts capable of steering an airship to safety. After completing a successful maneuver with Patoka, the airship Shenandoah was assigned a place in the Pacific Fleet. Read the full story in “Airship Takes Its Place on Battle Lines at Sea”
Submarine Cruiser: September 1925
In 1925, experts claimed that warships were going out of style, but tension between Great Britain and Germany was still strong as ever. Although the Treaty of Versailles limited the latter’s navy to a small amount of surface ships, they exploited the treaty’s loopholes by building vessels that were deceivingly small. For instance, the Admiral Graf Spee got around the 10,000-ton, 11-inch gun limit by using weight-saving techniques like electric arc welding. Prior to the Admiral Graf Spee‘s completion, however, a German naval architect designed a giant submarine cruiser, which appears considerably smaller than the era’s conventional battleships. Sailing nearby is the H.M.S. Nelson, Great Britain’ 30,000 ton, 16-inch gun battleship. Read the full story in “Marvels of Marine Invention”
Giant Guns for the HMS Nelson: December 1925
Speaking of the H.M.S. Nelson, here’s a picture of her impressive weaponry. Nine 16-inch guns mounted on three turrets, in addition to a secondary section of 6-inch guns, gave the Nelson and her sister ship Rodney the world’s most powerful armament of any battleship. The guns’ location forward of the ship’s superstructure also made the Nelson class of ships distinctive in form. Rumor has it that shortly after the release of Disney’s Snow White, the guns were nicknamed after Mickey Mouse, Minnie Mouse and the seven dwarves. During World War II, Nelson served in the Mediterranean, Atlantic, and Indian Oceans before being decommissioned in 1949. Read the full story in “Huge Guns for England’s Newest Battleship”
Italy’s Indestructible Semisubmersible: August 1926
Fold-Out Landing Field: January 1933
By 1933, World War II was well underway so naval experts busied themselves by coming up with better combat technology. Engineers planned that the H.M.S. Gotland, a Swedish cruiser, would come equipped with a canvas landing strip for seaplanes. While kept afloat by pontoons the landing field would pick up seaplanes while the cruiser was moving at full speed. A rotating catapult on the deck would be capable of launching planes in any direction. Alas, the canvas landing field never caught on, and seaplanes aboard the Gotland suffered damage caused by wave turbulence. In 1944, the cruiser was converted into an anti-aircraft cruisers. After the war, the Swedish military used her as a training center. Read the full story in “Canvas Landing Field for Seaplanes”
The Future of Naval Warfare: July 1938
When it comes to combat, bigger isn’t always better. A year before World War II began, we predicted that future war machines would become smaller to allow for accurate control. For instance, electrically-powered one-man submarines lowered from battleships would let someone fire a deadly missile at close range. Also, forget aircraft carriers, the future would be all about torpedo warfare on the high seas. Guided by radio control and manned by built-in motors, the torpedoes would cause havoc by landing directly onto an enemy warship. Read the full story in “War Machines Go Midget”
The Uncertain Fate of Battleships: April 1943
By World War II, it was clear that battleships were in a period of decline. Despite their role in guarding important convoys and their big guns, battleships were vulnerable to smaller weapons, like mines. Moreoever, they could not operate within range of enemy airbases and coast-defense guns. The prominence of airplanes at sea had rendered battleships into slow, expensive torpedo targets. Just a year before the last battleship launched, however, we made a case for the powerful old vessels. Torpedoes causing problems? Battleships used the heaviest armor out of any class of warships. Battleship design had adapted to aerial warfare by increasing antiaircraft fire power, or sky guns capable of hitting dive bombers with 400 quarter-pound shells a minute. Finally, since a battleship never travels alone, it will unlikely be completely open to attack. Read the full story in “Why Do We Keep on Building Battleships?”
Inside a Battleship: October 1943
In the end, the aircraft carrier proved too powerful. Battleships went out of service and many were converted into museums. The last two were removed from the U.S. Naval Vessels Register in 2006. Although we’ll never see a battleship in service again, and many of us will never make it out to one of the preserved models, this meticulously illustrated diagram should gives you a fairly thorough understanding of battleship design. Read the full story in “How a Battleship Works”
Supercarriers of the Future: January 1949
No, aircraft carriers of the future won’t house suburban neighborhoods, but according to our post-war predictions, supercarriers would one day grow large enough to hold 21 seven-room houses, including backyards, on their hangar decks. Almost immediately after the war, the Navy contemplated redesigning aircraft carriers to accommodate jet planes, which they believed could only get bigger. Their dream supercarrier would have a flight deck more than 1000 feet long. In comparison, the Midway was only 932 feet long and had obstructions that would hinder the paths of jet planes. Supercarriers of the future would use huge stern elevators to lift planes for launching, while escalators would carry crewman to the runways. Read the full story in “Why the Navy Wants Supercarriers”
Android users have always been waiting for a native app like AirDrop, which’s secure and fast, and Quick Share is just the app, but only for Samsung Galaxy devices. In this guide, we’ll see what Quick Share is, how it works, and how you can share files to other Samsung Galaxy devices using Quick Share.
What Is Samsung Quick Share?
Like Apple’s AirDrop and Google’s Nearby Share, Quick Share is a native file-sharing feature for Samsung Galaxy devices. What makes it better than other sharing apps is its ability to send links, app shortcuts, contacts, and music, along with other files like photos, videos, apks, documents, etc, in the original quality.
With Quick Share, you can share multiple files with up to 5 devices. The speeds are on the faster side, ranging from 5MB/s to 12MB/s in our tests, and this speed is only achievable as the Quick Share uses Bluetooth and Wi-Fi direct technology to search for the nearest Galaxy devices and then start the file sharing.
The Samsung Quick Share offers you two options for sharing files:
1. Sharing to Nearby Devices
The first method is to share files with Samsung Galaxy devices that are in close proximity. In this nearby sharing method, you don’t need an active internet connection, as the file is shared over Bluetooth and Wi-Fi Direct, giving you a faster transfer speed.
Quick Share allows you to share files up to 50GB to a maximum of five nearby devices. You can use this method when the receiver is nearby and has a Samsung Galaxy device, as Quick Share doesn’t allows you to send files to non-Samsung devices using this method.
The speed over Bluetooth is fast in this method, and it doesn’t need to pair devices to start the transfer, but we recommend you use Wi-Fi Direct, as you can achieve the max speeds over Wi-Fi. However, you may need to connect both Samsung Galaxy phones to a Wi-Fi network to transfer files via Wi-Fi Direct.
If you don’t have a Wi-Fi network at the moment, you can always connect both the sending and receiving devices to a mobile hotspot of any other phone, irrespective of the fact that the hotspot can share the internet or not.
2. Sharing As a Link
While the Nearby share method limits you from sharing files with only Samsung Galaxy devices near you, this method allows you to share files with any user around the globe. Link Sharing was a standalone feature in One UI, but Samsung merged it with the Quick Share app in the Feb 2023’s One UI 3.1 update.
In this method, the transfer speed and time depend upon your and the recipient’s internet connection, as the file that you want to share as the link is uploaded to Samsung Cloud, and a link for the same is generated and copied to your clipboard. After you share the link with the receiver via a third-party app or text message, he can access the file from the Samsung Cloud and download it on his phone or computer.
The size limit of sharing files as links is 5GB per day, and the files have an expiry date of two days. After that, the files will be automatically removed from the cloud service, and the recipient can’t download your file anymore.
The time limit improves privacy and prevents unwanted parties from accessing the file, but if you find it low, you can always upload the file to Google Drive or Apple’s iCloud and then share it with the user by copying the file’s link.
Now, let us look at how you can share files in their original quality using these options.
Share Files to Other Samsung Devices Using Quick Share
Quick Share is a fast and reliable way to share files from your Samsung Galaxy Device. Unlike other apps like Whatsapp or Instagram, it doesn’t lower the resolution of the image or video you’re sending. Now let us look at how to use Quick Share on your Samsung phone.
Enable Quick Share on Samsung Galaxy Phone
Quick Share comes preinstalled on Samsung Galaxy devices, but to use it, you may need to enable it from the settings first. Here’s how you can do it:
1. Launch the Settings app on your phone, open the Connected device options page, and tap on Quick Share.
2. In the Nearby sharing section, tap on Who can share with you option and choose the one from the list. Also, enable the toggle next to Show available devices on share panel.
3. After that, under the Share as link section, enable the toggle for Use Wi-Fi only option if you have a limited data plan or planning to save mobile data. You can also change the automatic file deletion settings by tapping the Auto delete expired files option.
The recipient’s phone should have the same settings as above, so don’t forget to do that. Now, as you’ve set up the Quick Share application with the correct settings, let us move to the sharing process.
Sending Files to Nearby Samsung Galaxy Phones
Transferring files to Samsung phones in close proximity using the Nearby Share option is the first method that we’ll try. Follow the given steps to share a file to Nearby Samsung devices using Quick Share:
1. Select the files you want to share, tap on the Share button, and choose the Quick Share option.
2. Now, your phone will start looking for nearby Samsung Galaxy devices. After scanning, your phone will show the receiver’s device in the Share to nearby Galaxy devices section
3. Tap on the receiver’s device to start sharing. Remember, you can share a file with at max five recipients using the nearby share option.
Sharing Files as A Link Using Quick Share
We know that the Share to Nearby Devices method limits us to only share files to Samsung devices within a close range of your phone. Sharing files as a link option gives you the freedom to transfer files to users anywhere around the globe. The only downside of this method is its daily limit, which is 5GB/day. Keeping the limit in mind, let us look at how you can use this method to share files.
1. Choose the files you want to share, tap on the Share button, and then select the Quick Share application for sharing.
2. Now, you need to choose the desired option under the Share to any device section. After you select an option, the file will start uploading to the Samsung Cloud.
3. The Copy link option will copy the link to your clipboard, and then you can share the link with the receiver. The Share link using app will also copy the link to the clipboard but also open the list of apps through which you can send the link. Lastly, the Share using QR code option will generate a QR code for the link, and when the recipient scans the QR Code, he’ll get access to the file.
With a link to Samsung Cloud, the recipient can access the files using any device and from anywhere in the world. Also, files shared using this method have an expiry date of two days, so if the receiver forgets to download the file within two days from the cloud, the file will get deleted, and you may need to share the file again.
But for any reason, if you want to check which files you’ve shared, or stop sharing a file, here’s how you can do it:
How to View Link Sharing History
1. Launch the Settings app and head over to Quick Share.
2. Tap on the Link sharing history to check the details of previous transfers.
Here you can see various information about transfers like file names, size, and expiration dates.
How to Stop Sharing a File
1. Go to the Quick Share page in the Settings app, and tap Link sharing history.
2. Tap on the transfer which you want to stop sharing.
3. Tap the Stop sharing option in the bottom left.
4. Tap the Stop sharing button in the next pop-up.
Can I Share Files Using Samsung Quick Share to iPhones?
The answer is Yes. You can share files to iPhones using Quick Share’s Share as a link mode. As we did above, select the files, copy the link, and send it to the iPhone user via direct message, a third-party app, or using a QR code.
Can I Share Files to Android devices that don’t have Quick Share?
Yes, you can share files to any Android device, doesn’t matter if it has Quick Share or not. The only limitation is that you can use the faster Nearby Share option in Quick Share for this situation, but you can always use the Share as link option.
Is Quick Share Secure?
Yes, Samsung Quick Share is safe to use. It also comes with features like auto deletion in link sharing to increase privacy and security.
Can I Disable Samsung Quick Share?
Share Files Using Samsung’s Version of AirDrop
The Samsung Quick Share is the best option for transferring files between Samsung Galaxy devices. It’s fast, reliable, and offers features like link sharing that no other application can offer. To conclude, we may now say that Quick Share has made file sharing between Samsung devices almost like AirDrop.
Its ability to share contacts, app shortcuts, music, and link sharing makes it a way better option than any third-party application. Samsung has already packed the Quick Share option with many features, but we will love to see if, in the future, we’ll be able to share watch faces using Quick Share, as we do with AirDrop.
Update the detailed information about How Smartphones Conquered The Tech World on the Daihoichemgio.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!