Trending February 2024 # Hp Vs Dell Laptops: Which Should You Buy? # Suggested March 2024 # Top 3 Popular

You are reading the article Hp Vs Dell Laptops: Which Should You Buy? updated in February 2024 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 Hp Vs Dell Laptops: Which Should You Buy?

In the market for a new laptop? Choosing the best laptop for you can be arduous, with a large range of laptop brands available. Whether you’re a gamer or looking for a new business laptop, there’s a laptop out there to suit your needs.

This article will give you the ultimate Dell vs HP laptop comparison to determine which brand makes the best laptop for you.

Table of Contents

Dell vs HP Laptop Specs

Hewlett-Packard (HP) and Dell Computers are two of the largest laptop manufacturers in the world. Both brands originate in the US, with Dell founded in Texas and HP in California. Each brand has an extensive line of high-quality products with popular laptops from each brand such as the HP Pavilion and Dell Vostro and Dell Inspiron range.


Both Dell and HP laptops are capable of delivering high performance.

That said, most of these laptops use integrated Intel HD graphics to accommodate their thin and light build, so probably won’t make for the best gaming laptop. Integrated graphics cards won’t offer the performance that a dedicated graphics processing unit (GPU) in a gaming laptop can.

If you’re looking for a Dell or HP laptop with maximum performance, Dell’s Alienware laptops have dedicated NVIDIA GeForce GTX or RTX graphics cards, but they’re not as slim or light as other Dell laptop lines.


Most HP and Dell laptops come with 8 or 16GB of RAM memory. Memory upgrades are available up to 32 GB on Dell laptops such as the Dell XPS 13, while upgrades up to 16GB are available on the HP Envy x360 and HP Spectre x360.

Battery Life

While it varies from laptop to laptop, both HP and Dell Laptop batteries generally last at least 10 hours on a charge. Typically, the greater the screen size and the higher the performance of the hardware (primarily GPU and CPU) the shorter the battery life.

Dell prefers using 2-cell and 3-cell batteries in their laptops, while HP tends toward 3-cell and 4-cell batteries.


Depending on the model, Dell and HP laptops use AMD or Intel processors.

Newer models from brands utilize the 12th-generation Intel Core i5 processors or Intel Core i7 processors. For AMD Ryzen models, newer laptops include the Ryzen 5 or Ryzen 7 counterparts.

Budget laptops usually feature either the Intel Core i3 dual-core processor or Ryzen 3.


Dell and HP laptops use solid-state drives (SSDs). These are very fast to write, read, and copy files. HP offers 128 GB, 256 GB, 512 GB, and 1 TB capacities while Dell offers 256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB, and even a 2 TB laptop in the form of the Alienware x17 R2 gaming laptop. Some laptops offer USB-C ports that allow you to add an external hard drive for extra storage if required.

Operating System

All Dell laptops operate on Microsoft Windows, most on Windows 11 Home. While this is the case for most HP laptops, HP Chromebooks operate on the Google Chrome OS.

Dell vs HP Laptop Design

It’s relatively hard to compare design factors between two laptop brands since they have so many different models available for purchase. However, there are some design features unique to each brand that we’ll discuss below.


HP and Dell use thin LED touch and non-touch displays that cover most of the screen bezel, making their laptops look sleek and high-tech. Their displays are generally crisp and bright with high resolution, but you’ll need to buy certain models to watch high dynamic range (HDR) content.

Both full HD and 4K displays, as well as touch screens, are available on their 2-in-1 laptop models. Dell also uses Corning Gorilla Glass which promises 100% Adobe RGB color accuracy.

Build Quality and Durability

The build quality of the Dell and HP laptops is very good overall. Both have machined aluminum cases that are strong, lightweight, and generally stay cool under heavy use. Additionally, Dell XPS series laptops feature carbon fiber on the base.

Dell vs HP Customer Experience

An often overlooked factor in deciding on a laptop or PC brand is the customer experience. Prices can differ drastically; if something goes wrong, you must know that you’re covered (or can easily get help).


Overall, HP laptops are more affordable than Dell laptops. HP Laptops start at less than $300 (the Chromebook 11a) and go up to over $2000 with the HP OMEN line. The cheapest Dell laptop is the Inspiron 15 at $300, with the most expensive HP laptop, the precision 7770 Workstation costing almost $7,500.

That said, when similarly equipped in the mid-to-high-end laptop range, both companies offer competitively priced laptops. Both brands tend to be cheaper than Lenovo laptops and Apple Macbooks.


Dell and HP offer a one-year limited warranty as standard for all laptop purchases. Extended warranties and on-site customer support are available with certain models or as extra-cost options.


Both brands let you purchase through authorized retailers, such as Amazon, and their own websites. If you are buying a laptop that you want to customize you will need to purchase it through the company website. This will also make claiming any warranty issues much easier.

The Bottom Line: Dell vs HP Comparison

Ultimately, which brand is right for you will depend on your wants, needs, and budget. When it comes to Dell vs HP, both have dozens of models that meet different needs. When choosing a laptop, it’s best to find a handful of models within your price range and then compare them one by one.

But from a bird’s eye view, we’d say that Dell takes the cake. With a bigger range of models at (generally) more reasonable prices, you’re more likely to find something perfect for you.

You're reading Hp Vs Dell Laptops: Which Should You Buy?

Google Pixel 5 Vs Apple Iphone 12: Which Should You Buy?

David Imel / Android Authority

The Google Pixel 5 was announced in the fall of 2023. It offers 5G support and continues the Pixel tradition of having great cameras and innovative features. That’s all inside a phone that costs $699. Apple also announced the iPhone 12 just a few weeks afterward. It also has some impressive hardware and software inside a phone that costs $100 more at $799. But which one is better: the Pixel 5 vs iPhone 12?

Read more: iPhone 12 series comparison

We have now reviewed both devices in full, so now we can give your our full thoughts and opinions on how these two mid-range phones compare with each other. Here is our look at the Google Pixel 5 vs iPhone 12.

Google Pixel 5 vs iPhone 12



Robert Triggs / Android Authority

Google put the mid-range Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chip in the Pixel 5, which isn’t top-notch but offers enough power for daily use. Apple offers its latest and greatest in-house chip, the Apple A14 Bionic, inside the iPhone 12. It’s safe to say the Apple A14 Bionic blows away the Snapdragon 765G chip in benchmark testing. Both phones support low-frequency and mmWave 5G networks. The iPhone 12, however, only adds mmWave support for the US market.


David Imel / Android Authority

The Pixel 5 has the same main 12.2MP camera we have seen in previous Pixel phones for the past two years. However, the secondary camera is a 16MP ultra-wide shooter, ditching the telephoto sensor found on the Pixel 4 series. The phone’s portrait mode now includes Google’s low-light Night Sight feature and adds locked, active, and cinematic pan modes for taking better video clips. There’s also an 8MP selfie camera in the front. In our review of the phone, we stated that the Pixel 5 can take solid images, but its continued use of older sensors is starting to show compared to other phones with newer sensors and higher megapixel counts.

The iPhone 12 includes two rear cameras. One is a 12MP wide sensor, while the other is a 12MP ultra-wide camera. It also has a 12MP front-facing camera in that big notch on the top of the display. It supports HDR and Dolby Vision HDR video recording at up to 30fps. It also allows users to edit their Dolby Vision HDR video clips on the phone. The Phone adds night mode time-lapse support, along with night mode on the ultra-wide camera and front camera. In our review, we noted that overall we were impressed by the photos we took with the iPhone 12, with solid colors and dynamic range, and taking videos also offers very good colors and stabilization.


Google Pixel 5 — $699/£599/€629

iPhone 12

64GB – $799/£799/€909

128GB -$849/£849/€959

256GB – $949/£949/€1,079

The Pixel 5 is available now for $699 in the US via the Google Store, Google Fi, Verizon, and retailers like Amazon, Best Buy, and Walmart. The iPhone 12 is also now available. Pricing begins at $799 for the 64GB model when you purchase them via AT&T or Verizon, or $829 with a fully unlocked phone.

Google Pixel 5 (New)

Google’s first 5G smartphone

The Google Pixel 5 may not be the high-end Pixel we were expecting, but it’s a pretty compelling mid-range option. Google is going back to basics with the Pixel 5, ditching higher-end features like face recognition and the quirky Motion Sense gestures.

See price at Amazon



Google Pixel 5 vs iPhone 12: Which one should you choose?

There’s no doubt that the Pixel 5 is an impressive Android phone for its price tag. It has a big 90Hz display, support for Android 11 out of the box, and its camera hardware and software are still solid. However, the iPhone 12 also has a lot to offer, with a slightly bigger display, more storage choices, and most importantly a new in-house processor that blows away the one inside the Pixel 5. The iPhone 12 also ships with iOS 14 out of the box, and like the Pixel 5 will get updated very quickly with security fixes and major and minor OS updates. However, battery life is definitely better on the Pixel 5 by a large margin.

Software and price may be the decider.

If you absolutely want to get an Android phone over an iPhone, the Pixel 5 is perhaps the best to get in this price range just for the OS updates alone. The iPhone 12 has some impressive specs as well, but it is at least $100 more expensive than the Pixel 5. Ultimately, it’s up to you if you want to spend that much more money on the iPhone 12, even with its lower amount of battery life.

Read more: 5 best Android alternatives to the iPhone 12

Xiaomi Mi A3 Vs Realme 5: Which One Should You Buy?

If we talk about other features, Mi A3 has ist own set of features at the starting price of Rs. 12,999 such as Gorilla Glass back, AI triple rear camera set up with a 48MP sensor, Super AMOLED display with an in-display fingerprint scanner and Google’s Android One program.

So if you are planning to buy a phone in the above-mentioned price brackets, you have these two options. Let us see how the latest two budget phones stand against each other.

Key Specs Mi A3 Realme 5


6.0-inch IPS

6.5-inch IPS

Screen Resolution

HD+, 720 x 1560 pixels

HD+, 720 x 1600 pixels

Operating System

Android 9 Pie with Android One

Android 9 Pie with ColorOS 6


Octa-core, Up to 2.0GHz

Octa-core, Up to 2.0Hz


Snapdragon 665

Snapdragon 665


Adreno 610

Adreno 610




Internal Storage



Expandable Storage

Yes, Up to 256GB

Yes, Up to 256GB

Primary Camera

12 MP, f/1.8+8 MP, f/2.2,(ultrawide)+2 MP (macro camera)+2 MP depth sensor

48 MP, f/1.8 (wide)+8 MP ultrawide+2 MP depth sensor

Front Camera

32 MP, f/2.0

13 MP, f/2.0

Video Recording

Up to [email protected]

Up to [email protected]


4,030 mAh

5,000 mAh

Fast Charging Support

Yes, 18W






153.5 x 71.9 x 8.5 mm

164.4 x 75.6 x 9.3 mm

Sim Card Connectivity

Dual SIM 

Dual SIM

The Mi A3 comes in Blue, Grey and White colors and the white color looks the best. While Realme 5 comes in Blue and Purple colors that have a crystal cur pattern on the back that looks good, but not as premium as the glass back.

If we use Mi A3 and Realme 5 by one hand, we can use Mi A3 easily as it has less thickness and is also lighter than Realme 5.

Overall, in terms of design and build quality Mi A3 looks and feels better because of the Gorilla Glass body and features like an in-display fingerprint scanner.

Coming to the display, Mi A3 sports a Super AMOLED display which is plus point for it. Realme 5 has an IPS LCD display. Both the display panels have HD+ screen resolution.

Mi A3 sports a triple camera setup at the back with a 48MP main sensor which is Sony IMX586. It has an 8MP wide-angle camera and a 2MP depth sensor.

Realme 5 comes with a quad-camera set up that has a 12MP main sensor, an 8MP wide, a 2MP depth and an extra 2MP macro camera.

Mi A3 offers good detailing as well as more natural colors while Realme 5 has little washed out colors with fewer details.

Here’s an example of portrait mode.

They both also have a dedicated night mode. Here you may find Realme’s picture better but it has fewer details.

The Mi A3 sports a 32MP selfie camera and Realme 5 has a 13MP camera at the front. The specs itself make the real difference in terms of selfie camera of these phones. You can see the difference in the below samples.

As you can see, Realme 5 makes skin tone whiter than Mi A3. Here again, Mi offers more natural colors and details. However, for social media enthusiasts these both phones will do a nice job of an uploadable selfie.

Software & UI: Android One Vs Custom UI

The Mi A3 is the phone by Xiaomi for Android lovers. It comes with the stock Android experience with the Android One program which means fast OS updates. Moreover, there is no bloatware and UI seems pretty clean like Google phones.

Both phones pack the latest Snapdragon 665 processor which is based on the 11nm process. It is an upgraded version of Snapdragon 660 and features eight Kryo 260 CPUs which have been divided into four performance and four efficiency cores.

For graphics, it supports the Adreno 610 GPU which the company claims can deliver long-lasting gameplay. So we played PUBG Mobile on both and the results were no different. Both can run the game at smooth graphics without any lag or any other issue.

In terms of other performance, such as multitasking, both are also similar. However, Android One offering on Mi A3 makes its performance a little bit smooth.

The Mi A3 comes with a 4,030mAh battery that has 18W fast charging support. This much size of the battery is fair enough for a day’s usage. Realme 5 comes with a bigger battery which is 5,000mAh. However, it doesn’t support fast charging technology.

If we talk about other features, Mi A3 comes with Hybrid card slots which means you can either use two SIM cards or one SIM and a micro SD. Realme 5 comes with triple card slots.

In terms of ports, Mi A3 has a USB Type C port while Realme 5 has a micro USB port. Other connectivity features are mostly similar.

Coming to the conclusion, with the Mi A3 you get a better design, AMOLED display, glass build, stock Android and 48MP camera performance at a slightly higher price. While Realme 5 has one extra camera and a big battery at a lesser price. So, if you are ready to spend those extra bucks, Mi A3 could be a better deal for you.

Nothing Ear (2) Vs. Airpods Pro 2: Which One Should You Buy?

Nothing launched its first TWS (True Wireless Stereo) earbuds in 2023. It was an immense success, and Nothing is continuing the same legacy with its Nothing Ear (2) in 2023. However, if you plan to buy one for your Apple device, you might get confused between the AirPods Pro 2 and the Nothing Ear (2).

If you’re in this scenario, I’ve compared Nothing Ear (2) and AirPods Pro 2 side-by-side to see which of these second-generation earphones is better. By the end of this guide, you can make a better purchase decision among them, depending on your needs.

AirPods Pro 2 vs Nothing Ear (2) – Specs

SpecificationsAirPods Pro 2Nothing Ear (2)ProcessorH2UnknownIPX ratingIPX4IP54 (buds), IP55 (case)Bluetooth5.35.3Size and weight (buds)1.22 x 0.86 x 0.94 inches, 0.19 ounces, 5.3 grams1.1 x 0.8 x 0.9 inches, 0.2 ounces, 5.6 gramsSize and weight (charging case)1.78 x 0.85 x 2.39 inches, 1.79 ounces, 51 grams1.8 x 0.9 x 2.4 inches, 2 ounces, 56.6 gramsBattery life7 hours, 30 hours with charging case6.3 hours, 36 hours with charging caseWireless chargingYesYes

On paper, the specifications of AirPods Pro 2 and Nothing Ear (2) look similar, with minor differences. However, it all comes down to how they perform in everyday life.

As for the features, the Nothing Ear (2) has an 11.6mm sized driver for audio output, which is slightly more than AirPods Pro 2’s 11mm drivers. Furthermore, the Nothing Ear (2) has Personalized ANC, Personalized sound profile, Find My earbuds and Ear Tip Fit Test. AirPods Pro 2, on the other hand, also boasts similar features like ANC, Personalized Spatial Audio, Find My and Ear Tip Fit Test.

AirPods Pro 2 vs Nothing Ear (2) – Design

Image credit: Apple

While Apple has its signature design language, Nothing doesn’t fall short. You won’t find many changes in the AirPods Pro 2 design compared to its previous generation. However, they’re still differentiable by anyone who knows how AirPods Pro looks.

Image credit:

Nothing Ear (2) takes a different approach to stand out, though. It comes with a completely transparent design similar to its previous generation, and if you keep up with tech, you’ll notice the Nothing Ear (2) immediately when you see it.

Regarding the case, Nothing Ear (2)’s case doesn’t have any tricks up its sleeves and features the same design as its predecessor. However, the AirPods Pro 2, on the other hand, has a lanyard loop on the case’s side, allowing you to attach it to anything and carry it around. Also, a speaker grill on the bottom to play different sounds, including Find My.

Although, you’ll find one significant difference when it comes to the protection of the case and buds. The AirPods Pro 2 features an IPX4 rating for both the case and the buds. On the contrary, Nothing Ear (2) features an IP54 rating for the buds and an IP55 rating for the case, which can be a huge deal for some of you.

AirPods Pro 2 vs Nothing Ear (2) – Touch controls

AirPods Pro 2 and Nothing Ear (2) support touch controls on the earbuds’ stems. However, the one on the Nothing Ear (2) has better responsiveness and tactile feedback than what we get on the AirPods Pro (2nd generation).

Pinching the stem of Nothing Ear (2) lets you play/pause, answer, or hang up calls while double-pressing it will skip media forward or reject calls, and then triple-pressing it will go back to the previous media. Finally, pressing and holding on either earbud will switch between ANC and Transparency mode.

Moreover, if you want to adjust your connected device’s volume and voice assistant, you can assign a double push-and-hold gesture to either earbud, which can be uncomfortable.

Image credit: Apple

On the contrary, Apple’s AirPods Pro 2 features a Force sensor where you need to press the earbud’s stem with a little bit of pressure, which can be weird at first, but you’ll get used to it soon. You get the same touch controls as Nothing Ear (2), but you’ll have to swipe instead of the double push-and-hold gesture when it comes to volume controls.

AirPods Pro 2 vs Nothing Ear (2) – Audio quality

Image credit: Apple

One of the most exciting features that you’ll get on AirPods Pro 2 is the Spatial Audio feature that creates a 360 experience in apps with Dolby Atmos support. The audio quality on AirPods Pro 2 is better when you compare it to its previous generation and has better Active Noise Cancellation, Personalized Spatial Audio, and Adaptive Transparency, thanks to the new H2 chip.

The sound is more balanced on the AirPods Pro 2, which is perfect for almost everyone, but if you’re someone who tinkers with an equalizer, you’ll have to go for the Nothing Ear (2).

Image credit:

When it comes to the Nothing Ear (2), it doesn’t have the Spatial Audio feature, but it has a personalized sound profile and a customizable equalizer. Besides, when it comes to the sound, you’ll find more bass with natural vocals that can make treble harsh sometimes. Lastly, Nothing Ear (2) can also produce Hi-Res audio, meaning you can play up to 1Mbps at frequencies up to 24bit/192kHz.

Call quality

There isn’t much comparison regarding the call quality since the AirPods Pro 2 crushed the Nothing Ear (2) here. However, if you get a Nothing Ear (2) for yourself, the mic quality might be slightly mushy as it doesn’t pick up the highs very much. On the other end, AirPods Pro 2 is one of the best TWS earbuds in the market with outstanding mic quality, and you don’t need to compromise much on anything, whether you’re on calls or recording an audio/video.


Regarding connectivity, Nothing Ear (2) and AirPods Pro (2nd generation) has Bluetooth 5.3 support, allowing them to connect to multiple devices and switch between them seamlessly. Nevertheless, you don’t have any operating system limitations, and it’ll switch between them with the Dual Connection feature. On the other side, AirPods Pro 2 allows you to switch between Apple devices only, which is great if you’re in the Apple ecosystem.

Furthermore, the Nothing Ear (2) features support for Hi-Res audio and LDAC 5.0 codec for high-resolution audio streaming via Bluetooth. Unfortunately, you won’t find this on the AirPods Pro 2, which can be something you need to watch out for if you’re an audiophile.

AirPods Pro 2 vs Nothing Ear (2) – Battery life

Image credit:

According to Nothing, Ear (2) has a custom chip that enhances battery life. It also features fast charging, meaning with a 10-minute charge, you can listen for up to 8 hours with ANC turned off. But when you use it with ANC turned on, you’ll get around 4 hours of battery life on a single charge. And with the charging case, you can extend it up to 36 hours.

Image credit: Apple

The AirPods Pro 2 takes the cake with a battery life of 6 hours with ANC on a single charge, and coupled with the charging case; you get around 30 hours of playback time with ANC. Besides, you’ll get about 7 hours of playback with ANC turned off and 5.5 hours with Spatial Audio. AirPods Pro 2 supports quick charging, but you can listen for up to an hour with a 5-minute charge.

AirPods Pro 2 vs Nothing Ear (2) – Pricing

You can purchase the AirPods Pro 2nd generation for $249, the same as the launch pricing of its previous generation. You can find them at full price on Apple Stores, but you may find them slightly cheaper at third-party sellers.

Contrarily, the Nothing Ear (2) costs $149, which is 50% higher than its predecessor, bringing it into the budget noise cancellation market, and 100$ cheaper than the AirPods Pro 2nd gen. Although more affordable, you won’t find it in all countries since it’s available in selected countries like India and the UK.

Which premium earbuds should you get?

Deciding what you should get between the AirPods Pro 2 and the Nothing Ear (2) is easy. If you’ve one or multiple Apple devices, like the iPhone, iPad, Mac, or Apple TV, simply go with the AirPods Pro 2. They’ll provide you with more value when you’re in the Apple ecosystem and fully utilize its potential.

Besides, if you have an Android phone or a Windows PC, you should go with the Nothing Ear (2) since they’ll provide you with a good experience similar to the AirPods Pro 2. It uses Google’s Fast Pair and Microsoft’s Swift Pair to connect and switch between devices.

However, if you’re under a budget and can’t afford the AirPods Pro (2nd gen), you can go with Nothing Ear (2). Albeit, you’ll need the Nothing X app to control its features on iOS, and it won’t have seamless switching between Apple devices. In the end, the choice is up to you and your requirements.


I hope this spec-by-spec comparison between AirPods Pro (2nd gen) and Nothing Ear (2) could make your purchase decision easier.

Read more:

Author Profile


Sajid is an Electronics and Communications Engineering graduate who loves writing about tech. He’s primarily interested in writing about Android, iOS, Mac, and Windows. You’ll find him watching Anime or Marvel when he’s not writing.

Wifi Vs. Ethernet Vs. 4G: Which Should You Use?

Since the days of dial-up connections, we’ve come a long way when it comes to getting a computer or laptop connected to the Internet. The most well-known method is WiFi which allows people to connect to the Internet via a router. But what about the other methods available for you to use? What are some other ways you can get a computer or laptop online, and when is it ideal to use them?


The more familiar method of getting a computer online, WiFi works by talking to a nearby router with access to the Internet. With devices coming with WiFi adapters built into them, WiFi connections are a solid choice for when you want to connect to the Internet.


WiFi is great for connecting to networks, whether they be at your home, your workplace, or in a public place such as an airport. With its ability to connect to the Internet wirelessly, it can be very useful for getting a device online where wires would be a huge hassle to use. Given how so many devices come pre-made with a WiFi adapter within them, you may be able to use WiFi functionality out of the box. Otherwise, if you need a PCI or USB adapter to get it online, they can be very inexpensive and last you years.

While WiFi is great, it’s not without some gripes. For use in public areas, you have to get within a decent range of the router. While you can technically connect from anywhere within its radius, you’ll need to be quite close to achieve download speeds that won’t have you tapping your fingers on the table. Sometimes there are small obstacles you’ll need to pass before you gain access to a public WiFi such as getting its password, signing up with an account, and even buying a data plan for the time that you use. This makes it more of a hassle to get online than, say, a mobile connection.

In the home WiFi isn’t perfect either. Interference with devices such as microwaves and fridges can cause weak or unstable signals. A neighbour’s routers can interfere with your own if both of the wireless channels are too close, so you’ll need to know about WiFi channels and how to change it on your router if you don’t want your router to decide for you. Even then, sometimes routers and WiFi adapters can give spotty, unstable, or even no WiFi signal without much explanation as to why which can be annoying.


While Ethernet may seem a little outdated compared to its wireless brothers, it still has a place within the modern age. What can Ethernet do better than WiFi and mobile connections?


By far the best aspect of using an Ethernet connection is its ability to draw the maximum amount of data your router and/or connection can handle. When going wireless using either WiFi or mobile, you naturally lose some of the connection through signal loss as it travels through the air and goes through obstacles such as walls and furniture. Cables naturally avoid this, so you’ll be seeing connections as fast and as stable as your Internet will allow. This is particularly good if you play very quick online games, as they require the lowest pings possible to play well.

It also means you can dodge WiFi interference, as your connection will be across the wire and not wireless. This means it doesn’t matter how many wireless connections the household and neighbours are using – your own connection won’t be fighting for a spot amongst them.

Of course, not being wireless, its strongest weakness is the fact that you need to run a wire between yourself and the router. In large houses or up/down stairs this can prove problematic if not impossible! As such, Ethernet is only really useful if you’re close to the router or if you’re able to get the wire to your router without inconveniencing others. If it really proves too much of a struggle to get the wire across, WiFi might be your best choice!

Mobile Internet

While mobile devices naturally use mobile Internet the most, you can use 3G and 4G connections on a computer or laptop. You can do this in one of two ways: either attach a USB dongle (usually sold by mobile network providers) that receives mobile Internet, or pick up a mobile WiFi router which acts like a normal router except it connects itself to mobile Internet like a phone would. So, what can mobile connections bring?


The key aspect for using mobile Internet is the ability to use it anywhere with coverage. If you find yourself in a spot where you can’t connect to a public WiFi router, but you can get a phone signal fine, you can get onto the Internet using a 3G or 4G connection. This makes mobile data an incredibly handy choice for someone always on the move. Who wants the convenience of the availability of mobile networks while also using the power of a laptop or computer over something like a phone or a tablet.

Despite how widespread mobile coverage can be and how 4G speeds are getting very good, it’s not the de-facto choice for computers just yet. Mobile connections can be quite expensive, and oftentimes more pricey than a home Internet connection. It also comes with some quite strict data usage, so performing “regular” computer-based actions like downloading large software and streaming HD video may get you into trouble. On top of all that, you may find it’s not as quick or stable as a WiFi connection can be. As such, it’s a great option if you find yourself unable to connect using Ethernet or WiFi; otherwise, you’re probably best off with those two!


So, which is best for you? Ideally, if you use the Internet mostly at home and your computer is very close to the router, connecting it up with an Ethernet cable can give you the best quality. If you can’t get a cable to reach, or you like to take a laptop out and about with you in urban areas, a WiFi connection will do the job nicely. However, if you’re an avid explorer and find yourself in places without routers around you, you can still get use out of your laptop by using mobile Internet.

Do you use one of the above methods extensively? Did you used to use one method then swapped to a different one and stuck with it? Let us know below.

Simon Batt

Simon Batt is a Computer Science graduate with a passion for cybersecurity.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Sign up for all newsletters.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and European users agree to the data transfer policy. We will not share your data and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Nintendo Switch Vs. Lite: Which Of Nintendo’s Handheld Gaming Consoles Should You Buy?

We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more ›

Written By Nicholas Ware

Published Dec 6, 2023 5:00 PM

With the discontinuation of the PlayStation Vita in 2023 and its own 3DS in 2023, Nintendo’s Switch line of consoles became the only truly portable console on the market. While mobile games are currently thriving on smartphones and tablets, iOS and Android can only capture a fraction of the experience offered by Nintendo’s Switch. Classic, well-known game series like Super Mario Bros. and Mario Kart have mobile versions, but the options, pay structure, and smoothness of gameplay leave a lot to be desired for many gamers. Players looking for games with deep, Day-One content and dozens of hours of gameplay don’t consider the mobile vs. Switch debate, but rather the Nintendo Switch vs. Lite debate.

Wait, Nintendo introduced two versions of the same console?

Nintendo Switch initially debuted way back in 2023. The Switch’s versatility sets its hardware apart from typical home-bound consoles like the Xbox Series X and the PS5. Plugged into a TV, the Switch acts like a typical gaming machine. Snap the JoyCon controllers onto the 6.2-inch LCD screen, however, and you can take the full Switch gaming experience out into the world. . Dozens of reskins of the base Nintendo Switch, focusing solely on aesthetics, emerged, but no hardware iterations appeared until the Nintendo Switch Lite was released in late 2023. The Lite is a pared-down Switch but with a 33-percent lower retail price and a slightly smaller 5.5-inch screen. The question for potential buyers is, of course, if what they lose is worth the $100 they save.

The Switch Lite isn’t so much an improved Switch, as it is a refocused Switch. Some might argue that Nintendo Switch vs. Lite isn’t a necessary debate, as they are for slightly different gaming populations. Ditching the versatility of the original, the Switch Lite is a single form-factor machine that can only be played as a portable system. The Switch Lite is aimed at cost-conscious casual gamers, rather than the core gaming fan. Its design skews younger, with a smaller screen and body, larger face buttons than the Switch’s JoyCon controllers, and generally more durable construction. As a result of the smaller screen and lower functionality, the Switch Lite battery life is longer than the original Switch model played in handheld mode. However, all the changes mean that the Switch Lite can only fulfill some of the functions that players desire.

Got it. Now what makes the original Nintendo Switch special?

The standard switch plugs into a larger television to enable gaming on the biggest screen in your chúng tôi Switch Lite can’t do that. It’s handheld only. 

When hooked up to a television, the Switch’s controllers slide off the screen and can slide into a plastic casing that allows them to function as a freely held controller. Additionally, these individual controller pieces, called JoyCons, have similar functions to the Wiimotes of Nintendo’s previous Wii controller, allowing for gesture-, tilt-, and point-based interactions with games. If you plan to buy Nintendo Switch games like the Just Dance series or Super Mario Party, they actually require these types of interactions to play.

As a handheld with JoyCons attached, the Nintendo Switch dimensions measure 9.5-inches long, 4-inches tall, and 0.5-inches thick. The Nintendo Switch screen size measures 6.2-inches diagonally with a resolution of 720p (1280×720), which is starting to feel a little paltry several years after the Switch release. The whole console weighs just under 1 pound. If desired, the Switch screen can stand up, detached from the JoyCons, and function as a small monitor for play, with multiple players using JoyCon segments or additional controllers to play multiplayer.

Nintendo Switch battery life depends on the game, with some being more taxing than others. Generally, a fully charged Nintendo Switch will play games for somewhere between 4.5 hours and 9 hours. A battery recharge takes about 3 hours and 30 minutes.

OK, so what’s missing from the Switch Lite?

First and foremost, the Lite cannot connect to a television—all play is bound to its 5.5-inch built-in screen. Because the controllers cannot be removed from the Switch Lite, games like 1-2-Switch, Just Dance and Super Mario Party are unplayable unless you wirelessly pair separately purchased JoyCons to the system. With no included kickstand and its small display, using the Switch Lite as a monitor for local multiplayer is extremely awkward compared to the more seamless experience of the Switch.

The Switch Lite only weighs roughly 10 ounces. The overall size of the system, except for depth, is also smaller, measuring 8.2-inches long and 3.6-inches high. This makes the Switch Lite easier to hold for smaller hands.

While the Nintendo Switch Lite battery life outperforms the original 2023 Switch model, the Nintendo Switch battery life of any Switch manufactured since late 2023 is improved as it features an updated battery with the play time listed above. The Switch Lite doesn’t quite measure up, lasting between 3 hours and 7 hours per charge, though the recharge time is 30 minutes faster than the base Switch, clocking in at only 3 hours.

Hmmm, so does anything make the Switch Lite better than the Switch?

The Switch Lite’s smaller size makes it easier for smaller kids to play. The traditional Switch in handheld mode is one of the biggest handheld consoles of all time, and may ever feel slightly too big for some adults. 

I’m still not sure. Is the Nintendo Switch or Switch Lite right for me?

For the vast majority of gamers, the traditional $300 Nintendo Switch is the better choice simply because of its versatility. Even if you don’t plan to play Switch much on your home television, the fact that you can is paramount. Tabletop mode, with the Switch screen acting as a small monitor, is more useful than you would think if you’re interested in games like Super Smash Bros. Ultimate or Mario Kart 8 Deluxe. 

The local multiplayer experience on a Switch Lite is demonstrably worse unless every player has their own console. Additionally, you don’t need to purchase an additional set of JoyCons, which would set you back $80, if you want to play motion-controlled titles. That purchase alone would nearly eat up the $100 savings that the Lite offers.

The one situation in which the Switch Lite is a clear-cut winner is if you are purchasing one to be used by a child or preteen. The smaller Switch Lite will fit their hands better, they may or may not have access to a television to play the Switch in their room (which is likely going to be their most common play space). The Switch Lite is slightly easier to pack and play on long car trips in the back seat, and if they’re prone to treat their belongings roughly, the Switch Lite is a bit more durable or, in the event of a disaster, cheaper to replace. Overall, the Switch console is an excellent gaming machine with a great library of titles. It has games for every age and predilection. But for most people, when it comes to the difference between Nintendo Switch and Nintendo Switch Lite, the lost elements simply aren’t worth the $100. Nine times out of 10, the traditional Switch will be the right choice. However, regardless of your choice in the great Nintendo Switch vs. Lite debate, you’ll enjoy the heck out of the machine.

Update the detailed information about Hp Vs Dell Laptops: Which Should You Buy? on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!